Iceland has a population of 392K, compared to Nigeria's 223.8M. Nigeria is 571.2 times more populous than Iceland. Economically, Nigeria ($252.3B) has a GDP 7.6 times larger than Iceland's ($33.3B). Nigeria covers 923,768 km², 9.0 times larger than Iceland's 103,000 km². Life expectancy in Iceland stands at 82.6 years, 28.1 years higher than Nigeria's 54.5 years.
| Population | 392K | 223.8M |
| Area | 103,000 km² | 923,768 km² |
| GDP | $33.3B | $252.3B |
| GDP Per Capita | $86,040.531 | $1,084.16 |
| Life Expectancy | 82.6 yrs | 54.5 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 1.9 | 60.1 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 3.6% | 3.1% |
| Capital | Reykjavik | Abuja |
| Region | Europe | Africa |
| Languages | Icelandic | English |
| Currencies | ISK (kr) | NGN (₦) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Nigeria is 571.2 times more populous than Iceland, with 223.8M residents compared to 392K. Iceland is a nation of 392K people, while Nigeria is among the world's 15 most populous countries. In terms of population density, Iceland averages 4 people per km² (sparse), while Nigeria averages 242 people per km² (dense). Nigeria has grown at 2.33% annually over the past decade. Population growth data is not available for Iceland.
Iceland is classified as a high-income economy, while Nigeria is classified as a low-income economy. The Nigeria economy ($252.3B) is 7.6 times larger than Iceland's ($33.3B). Iceland's GDP per capita of $86,040.531 is 207% above the regional average of 28,000 for Europe. Nigeria's GDP per capita of $1,084.16 is 51% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. On a per-capita basis, residents of Iceland are on average 79.4 times wealthier than those in Nigeria.
Life expectancy in Iceland is 82.6 years, compared to 54.5 years in Nigeria, a gap of 28.1 years. Iceland (82.6 years) is 10.6 years above the global average of 72 years, while Nigeria (54.5 years) is 17.5 years below the global average of 72 years. At 60.1 deaths per 1,000 live births, Nigeria's infant mortality is 3063% higher than Iceland's 1.9.
Nigeria (923,768 km²) is 9.0 times larger by land area than Iceland (103,000 km²). Iceland shares borders with 0 countries, while Nigeria borders 4 countries. Iceland spans 1 timezone, compared to Nigeria's 1 timezone. Iceland lies in Europe, while Nigeria is located in Africa. Iceland is categorized within the Europe region (Northern Europe), whereas Nigeria belongs to Africa (Western Africa).
The most significant difference between Iceland and Nigeria is in population: Iceland's 392K compared to Nigeria's 223.8M represents a 100% gap. The most significant difference between Iceland and Nigeria is in GDP per capita: Iceland's $86,040.531 compared to Nigeria's $1,084.16 represents a 99% gap. The most significant difference between Iceland and Nigeria is in infant mortality: Iceland's 1.9 per 1,000 compared to Nigeria's 60.1 per 1,000 represents a 97% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Iceland's high-income economy and Nigeria's low-income economy.
Iceland has a GDP per capita of $86,040.531, which is 79.4x that of Nigeria ($1,084.16). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Iceland is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Nigeria is 63.7x more densely populated than Iceland (242 vs 4 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Iceland's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Iceland live an average of 28.1 years longer than those of Nigeria (82.6 vs 54.5 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Nigeria's economy grew at 4.1% compared to Iceland's -1.0%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Nigeria has a modest edge in economic dynamism. Iceland's negative growth indicates economic contraction.
For family travel, Iceland generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (1.9 vs 60.1 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Nigeria offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Iceland's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Nigeria is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $1,084.16 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Nigeria can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Iceland. However, Iceland may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Iceland's life expectancy of 82.6 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Nigeria may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Iceland's GDP per capita is 79.4x that of Nigeria, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Iceland, while Nigeria offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Nigeria can approach or exceed average costs in Iceland's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Iceland and Nigeria, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Iceland spans 1 timezone while Nigeria covers 1. Nigeria's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Nigeria is larger by population, with 223.8M residents compared to Iceland's 392K. Nigeria is 571.2 times more populous than Iceland.
Nigeria has the higher GDP at $252.3B, compared to Iceland's $33.3B. Nigeria's economy is 7.6 times larger.
Iceland has a higher life expectancy at 82.6 years, compared to Nigeria's 54.5 years. The gap between the two countries is 28.1 years. Iceland's life expectancy is 10.6 years above the global average of 72 years, while Nigeria's is 17.5 years below the global average of 72 years.
Nigeria is larger by land area, covering 923,768 km² compared to Iceland's 103,000 km². Nigeria is 9.0 times larger than Iceland.
Iceland recognizes the following official language: Icelandic. Nigeria recognizes: English. The two countries do not share an official language.
Iceland has lower inflation at 5.9%, compared to Nigeria's 33.2%. Iceland's inflation is moderately elevated above the global median of 3.5%, while Nigeria's rate is severely elevated at 33.2%, a rate that erodes household purchasing power.
For family travel, Iceland generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (1.9 vs 60.1 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Nigeria offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly a...
Nigeria is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $1,084.16 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Nigeria can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Iceland. However, Iceland may offer better value ...
Iceland's life expectancy of 82.6 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Nigeria may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, clima...
Iceland's GDP per capita is 79.4x that of Nigeria, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Iceland, while Nigeria offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantl...
For digital nomads choosing between Iceland and Nigeria, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Iceland spans 1 timezone while Nigeria covers 1. Nigeria's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote inco...