Sudan has a population of 51.7M, compared to Jordan's 11.7M. Sudan is 4.4 times more populous than Jordan. Economically, Jordan ($53.4B) has a GDP 1.1 times larger than Sudan's ($49.7B). Sudan covers 1,886,068 km², 21.1 times larger than Jordan's 89,342 km². Life expectancy in Jordan stands at 77.8 years, 11.5 years higher than Sudan's 66.3 years.
| Population | 51.7M | 11.7M |
| Area | 1,886,068 km² | 89,342 km² |
| GDP | $49.7B | $53.4B |
| GDP Per Capita | $984.608 | $4,618.096 |
| Life Expectancy | 66.3 yrs | 77.8 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 39.2 | 12.2 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | — | 16.5% |
| Capital | Khartoum | Amman |
| Region | Africa | Asia |
| Languages | Arabic, English | Arabic |
| Currencies | SDG (ج.س) | JOD (د.ا) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Sudan is 4.4 times more populous than Jordan, with 51.7M residents compared to 11.7M. Sudan is among the world's 30 most populous countries, while Jordan is a nation of 11.7M people. In terms of population density, Sudan averages 27 people per km² (sparse), while Jordan averages 131 people per km² (moderate). Jordan has grown at 3.65% annually over the past decade. Population growth data is not available for Sudan.
Sudan is classified as a low-income economy, while Jordan is classified as a upper-middle-income economy. The Jordan economy ($53.4B) is 1.1 times larger than Sudan's ($49.7B). Sudan's GDP per capita of $984.608 is 55% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Jordan's GDP per capita of $4,618.096 is 59% below the regional average of 11,200 for Asia. On a per-capita basis, residents of Jordan are on average 4.7 times wealthier than those in Sudan.
Life expectancy in Sudan is 66.3 years, compared to 77.8 years in Jordan, a gap of 11.5 years. Jordan (77.8 years) is 5.8 years above the global average of 72 years, while Sudan (66.3 years) is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years. At 39.2 deaths per 1,000 live births, Sudan's infant mortality is 221% higher than Jordan's 12.2.
Sudan (1,886,068 km²) is 21.1 times larger by land area than Jordan (89,342 km²). Sudan shares borders with 7 countries, while Jordan borders 5 countries. Sudan spans 1 timezone, compared to Jordan's 1 timezone. Sudan lies in Africa, while Jordan is located in Asia. Sudan is categorized within the Africa region (Northern Africa), whereas Jordan belongs to Asia (Western Asia).
The most significant difference between Sudan and Jordan is in land area: Sudan's 1,886,068 km² compared to Jordan's 89,342 km² represents a 95% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Jordan is in GDP per capita: Sudan's $984.608 compared to Jordan's $4,618.096 represents a 79% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Jordan is in population: Sudan's 51.7M compared to Jordan's 11.7M represents a 77% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Sudan's low-income economy and Jordan's upper-middle-income economy.
Jordan has a GDP per capita of $4,618.096, which is 4.7x that of Sudan ($984.608). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Jordan is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Jordan is 4.8x more densely populated than Sudan (131 vs 27 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Sudan's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Jordan live an average of 11.5 years longer than those of Sudan (77.8 vs 66.3 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Jordan's economy grew at 2.5% compared to Sudan's -14.0%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Jordan has a modest edge in economic dynamism. Sudan's negative growth indicates economic contraction.
For family travel, Jordan generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (12.2 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Jordan's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Jordan. However, Jordan may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Jordan's life expectancy of 77.8 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Jordan's GDP per capita is 4.7x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Jordan, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Sudan can approach or exceed average costs in Jordan's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Jordan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Jordan covers 1. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Sudan is larger by population, with 51.7M residents compared to Jordan's 11.7M. Sudan is 4.4 times more populous than Jordan.
Jordan has the higher GDP at $53.4B, compared to Sudan's $49.7B. Jordan's economy is 1.1 times larger.
Jordan has a higher life expectancy at 77.8 years, compared to Sudan's 66.3 years. The gap between the two countries is 11.5 years. Sudan's life expectancy is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years, while Jordan's is 5.8 years above the global average of 72 years.
Sudan is larger by land area, covering 1,886,068 km² compared to Jordan's 89,342 km². Sudan is 21.1 times larger than Jordan.
Sudan recognizes the following languages: Arabic, English. Jordan recognizes: Arabic. Both countries share at least one common language.
Inflation data is not available for Sudan. Jordan's inflation rate is 1.6%.
For family travel, Jordan generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (12.2 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly att...
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Jordan. However, Jordan may offer better value in spec...
Jordan's life expectancy of 77.8 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate ...
Jordan's GDP per capita is 4.7x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Jordan, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by ci...
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Jordan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Jordan covers 1. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both...