Australia has a population of 27.5M, compared to Burkina Faso's 24.1M. Australia is 1.1 times more populous than Burkina Faso. Economically, Australia ($1.76T) has a GDP 76.0 times larger than Burkina Faso's ($23.1B). Australia covers 7,692,024 km², 28.2 times larger than Burkina Faso's 272,967 km². Life expectancy in Australia stands at 83.1 years, 22.0 years higher than Burkina Faso's 61.1 years.
| Population | 27.5M | 24.1M |
| Area | 7,692,024 km² | 272,967 km² |
| GDP | $1.76T | $23.1B |
| GDP Per Capita | $64,603.986 | $981.993 |
| Life Expectancy | 83.1 yrs | 61.1 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 3.1 | 44.8 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 4.1% | 3.5% |
| Capital | Canberra | Ouagadougou |
| Region | Oceania | Africa |
| Languages | English | French |
| Currencies | AUD ($) | XOF (Fr) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Australia is 1.1 times more populous than Burkina Faso, with 27.5M residents compared to 24.1M. Australia is a nation of 27.5M people, while Burkina Faso is a nation of 24.1M people. In terms of population density, Australia averages 4 people per km² (sparse), while Burkina Faso averages 88 people per km² (moderate). While Australia has grown at 1.43% annually over the past decade, Burkina Faso has grown at 2.67% per year over the same period.
Australia is classified as a high-income economy, while Burkina Faso is classified as a low-income economy. The Australia economy ($1.76T) is 76.0 times larger than Burkina Faso's ($23.1B). Australia's GDP per capita of $64,603.986 is 105% above the regional average of 31,500 for Oceania. Burkina Faso's GDP per capita of $981.993 is 55% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. On a per-capita basis, residents of Australia are on average 65.8 times wealthier than those in Burkina Faso.
Life expectancy in Australia is 83.1 years, compared to 61.1 years in Burkina Faso, a gap of 22.0 years. Australia (83.1 years) is 11.1 years above the global average of 72 years, while Burkina Faso (61.1 years) is 10.9 years below the global average of 72 years. At 44.8 deaths per 1,000 live births, Burkina Faso's infant mortality is 1345% higher than Australia's 3.1.
Australia (7,692,024 km²) is 28.2 times larger by land area than Burkina Faso (272,967 km²). Australia shares borders with 0 countries, while Burkina Faso borders 6 countries. Australia spans 8 timezones, compared to Burkina Faso's 1 timezone. Australia lies in Oceania, while Burkina Faso is located in Africa. Australia is categorized within the Oceania region (Australia and New Zealand), whereas Burkina Faso belongs to Africa (Western Africa).
The most significant difference between Australia and Burkina Faso is in GDP: Australia's $1.76T compared to Burkina Faso's $23.1B represents a 99% gap. The most significant difference between Australia and Burkina Faso is in GDP per capita: Australia's $64,603.986 compared to Burkina Faso's $981.993 represents a 98% gap. The most significant difference between Australia and Burkina Faso is in land area: Australia's 7,692,024 km² compared to Burkina Faso's 272,967 km² represents a 96% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Australia's high-income economy and Burkina Faso's low-income economy.
Australia has a GDP per capita of $64,603.986, which is 65.8x that of Burkina Faso ($981.993). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Australia is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Burkina Faso is 24.6x more densely populated than Australia (88 vs 4 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Australia's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Australia live an average of 22.0 years longer than those of Burkina Faso (83.1 vs 61.1 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Burkina Faso's economy grew at 4.8% compared to Australia's 1.4%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Burkina Faso has a modest edge in economic dynamism.
For family travel, Australia generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (3.1 vs 44.8 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Burkina Faso offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Australia's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Burkina Faso is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $981.993 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Burkina Faso can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Australia. However, Australia may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Australia's life expectancy of 83.1 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Burkina Faso may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Australia's GDP per capita is 65.8x that of Burkina Faso, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Australia, while Burkina Faso offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Burkina Faso can approach or exceed average costs in Australia's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Australia and Burkina Faso, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Australia spans 8 timezones while Burkina Faso covers 1. Burkina Faso's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Australia is larger by population, with 27.5M residents compared to Burkina Faso's 24.1M. Australia is 1.1 times more populous than Burkina Faso.
Australia has the higher GDP at $1.76T, compared to Burkina Faso's $23.1B. Australia's economy is 76.0 times larger.
Australia has a higher life expectancy at 83.1 years, compared to Burkina Faso's 61.1 years. The gap between the two countries is 22.0 years. Australia's life expectancy is 11.1 years above the global average of 72 years, while Burkina Faso's is 10.9 years below the global average of 72 years.
Australia is larger by land area, covering 7,692,024 km² compared to Burkina Faso's 272,967 km². Australia is 28.2 times larger than Burkina Faso.
Australia recognizes the following official language: English. Burkina Faso recognizes: French. The two countries do not share an official language.
Australia has lower inflation at 3.2%, compared to Burkina Faso's 4.2%. Australia's inflation is moderately elevated above the global median of 3.5%, while Burkina Faso's rate is moderately elevated above the global median of 3.5%.
For family travel, Australia generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (3.1 vs 44.8 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Burkina Faso offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both ...
Burkina Faso is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $981.993 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Burkina Faso can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Australia. However, Australia may offer ...
Australia's life expectancy of 83.1 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Burkina Faso may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access...
Australia's GDP per capita is 65.8x that of Burkina Faso, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Australia, while Burkina Faso offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varie...
For digital nomads choosing between Australia and Burkina Faso, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Australia spans 8 timezones while Burkina Faso covers 1. Burkina Faso's lower cost of living makes it attractive for st...
Australia, 1994 to 2023
Burkina Faso, 1994 to 2023