Burkina Faso has a population of 24.1M, compared to Hungary's 9.5M. Burkina Faso is 2.5 times more populous than Hungary. Economically, Hungary ($222.7B) has a GDP 9.6 times larger than Burkina Faso's ($23.1B). Burkina Faso covers 272,967 km², 2.9 times larger than Hungary's 93,028 km². Life expectancy in Hungary stands at 76.8 years, 15.7 years higher than Burkina Faso's 61.1 years.
| Population | 24.1M | 9.5M |
| Area | 272,967 km² | 93,028 km² |
| GDP | $23.1B | $222.7B |
| GDP Per Capita | $981.993 | $23,292.326 |
| Life Expectancy | 61.1 yrs | 76.8 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 44.8 | 3.2 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 3.5% | 4.5% |
| Capital | Ouagadougou | Budapest |
| Region | Africa | Europe |
| Languages | French | Hungarian |
| Currencies | XOF (Fr) | HUF (Ft) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Burkina Faso is 2.5 times more populous than Hungary, with 24.1M residents compared to 9.5M. Burkina Faso is a nation of 24.1M people, while Hungary is a nation of 9.5M people. In terms of population density, Burkina Faso averages 88 people per km² (moderate), while Hungary averages 103 people per km² (moderate). While Burkina Faso has grown at 2.67% annually over the past decade, Hungary has grown at -0.29% per year over the same period.
Burkina Faso is classified as a low-income economy, while Hungary is classified as a high-income economy. The Hungary economy ($222.7B) is 9.6 times larger than Burkina Faso's ($23.1B). Burkina Faso's GDP per capita of $981.993 is 55% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Hungary's GDP per capita of $23,292.326 is 17% below the regional average of 28,000 for Europe. On a per-capita basis, residents of Hungary are on average 23.7 times wealthier than those in Burkina Faso.
Life expectancy in Burkina Faso is 61.1 years, compared to 76.8 years in Hungary, a gap of 15.7 years. Hungary (76.8 years) is 4.8 years above the global average of 72 years, while Burkina Faso (61.1 years) is 10.9 years below the global average of 72 years. At 44.8 deaths per 1,000 live births, Burkina Faso's infant mortality is 1300% higher than Hungary's 3.2.
Burkina Faso (272,967 km²) is 2.9 times larger by land area than Hungary (93,028 km²). Burkina Faso shares borders with 6 countries, while Hungary borders 7 countries. Burkina Faso spans 1 timezone, compared to Hungary's 1 timezone. Burkina Faso lies in Africa, while Hungary is located in Europe. Burkina Faso is categorized within the Africa region (Western Africa), whereas Hungary belongs to Europe (Central Europe).
The most significant difference between Burkina Faso and Hungary is in GDP per capita: Burkina Faso's $981.993 compared to Hungary's $23,292.326 represents a 96% gap. The most significant difference between Burkina Faso and Hungary is in infant mortality: Burkina Faso's 44.8 per 1,000 compared to Hungary's 3.2 per 1,000 represents a 93% gap. The most significant difference between Burkina Faso and Hungary is in GDP: Burkina Faso's $23.1B compared to Hungary's $222.7B represents a 90% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Burkina Faso's low-income economy and Hungary's high-income economy.
Hungary has a GDP per capita of $23,292.326, which is 23.7x that of Burkina Faso ($981.993). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Hungary is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Hungary is 1.2x more densely populated than Burkina Faso (103 vs 88 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Burkina Faso's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Hungary live an average of 15.7 years longer than those of Burkina Faso (76.8 vs 61.1 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Burkina Faso's economy grew at 4.8% compared to Hungary's 0.6%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Burkina Faso has a modest edge in economic dynamism.
For family travel, Hungary generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (3.2 vs 44.8 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Burkina Faso offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Hungary's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Burkina Faso is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $981.993 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Burkina Faso can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Hungary. However, Hungary may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Hungary's life expectancy of 76.8 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Burkina Faso may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Hungary's GDP per capita is 23.7x that of Burkina Faso, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Hungary, while Burkina Faso offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Burkina Faso can approach or exceed average costs in Hungary's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Burkina Faso and Hungary, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Burkina Faso spans 1 timezone while Hungary covers 1. Burkina Faso's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Burkina Faso is larger by population, with 24.1M residents compared to Hungary's 9.5M. Burkina Faso is 2.5 times more populous than Hungary.
Hungary has the higher GDP at $222.7B, compared to Burkina Faso's $23.1B. Hungary's economy is 9.6 times larger.
Hungary has a higher life expectancy at 76.8 years, compared to Burkina Faso's 61.1 years. The gap between the two countries is 15.7 years. Burkina Faso's life expectancy is 10.9 years below the global average of 72 years, while Hungary's is 4.8 years above the global average of 72 years.
Burkina Faso is larger by land area, covering 272,967 km² compared to Hungary's 93,028 km². Burkina Faso is 2.9 times larger than Hungary.
Burkina Faso recognizes the following official language: French. Hungary recognizes: Hungarian. The two countries do not share an official language.
Hungary has lower inflation at 3.7%, compared to Burkina Faso's 4.2%. Hungary's inflation is moderately elevated above the global median of 3.5%, while Burkina Faso's rate is moderately elevated above the global median of 3.5%.
For family travel, Hungary generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (3.2 vs 44.8 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Burkina Faso offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-frien...
Burkina Faso is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $981.993 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Burkina Faso can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Hungary. However, Hungary may offer bett...
Hungary's life expectancy of 76.8 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Burkina Faso may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, ...
Hungary's GDP per capita is 23.7x that of Burkina Faso, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Hungary, while Burkina Faso offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies si...
For digital nomads choosing between Burkina Faso and Hungary, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Burkina Faso spans 1 timezone while Hungary covers 1. Burkina Faso's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretch...
Burkina Faso, 1994 to 2023
Hungary, 1994 to 2023