Chile has a population of 20.2M, compared to South Sudan's 15.8M. Chile is 1.3 times more populous than South Sudan. Chile covers 756,102 km², 1.2 times larger than South Sudan's 619,745 km². Life expectancy in Chile stands at 81.2 years, 23.6 years higher than South Sudan's 57.6 years.
| Population | 20.2M | 15.8M |
| Area | 756,102 km² | 619,745 km² |
| GDP | $330.3B | — |
| GDP Per Capita | $16,709.889 | — |
| Life Expectancy | 81.2 yrs | 57.6 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 6.2 | 72.6 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 9.0% | — |
| Capital | Santiago | Juba |
| Region | Americas | Africa |
| Languages | Spanish | English |
| Currencies | CLP ($) | SSP (£) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Chile is 1.3 times more populous than South Sudan, with 20.2M residents compared to 15.8M. Chile is a nation of 20.2M people, while South Sudan is a nation of 15.8M people. In terms of population density, Chile averages 27 people per km² (sparse), while South Sudan averages 25 people per km² (sparse). Population growth rate data is not available for either country over the past decade.
Chile is classified as a high-income economy, while South Sudan is classified as a low-income economy. Chile's GDP stands at $330.3B. GDP data is not available for South Sudan. Chile's GDP per capita of $16,709.889 is 24% above the regional average of 13,500 for Americas. Economic indicator data is not available for South Sudan.
Life expectancy in Chile is 81.2 years, compared to 57.6 years in South Sudan, a gap of 23.6 years. Chile (81.2 years) is 9.2 years above the global average of 72 years, while South Sudan (57.6 years) is 14.4 years below the global average of 72 years. At 72.6 deaths per 1,000 live births, South Sudan's infant mortality is 1071% higher than Chile's 6.2.
Chile (756,102 km²) is 1.2 times larger by land area than South Sudan (619,745 km²). Chile shares borders with 3 countries, while South Sudan borders 6 countries. Chile spans 2 timezones, compared to South Sudan's 1 timezone. Chile lies in South America, while South Sudan is located in Africa. Chile is categorized within the Americas region (South America), whereas South Sudan belongs to Africa (Middle Africa).
The most significant difference between Chile and South Sudan is in infant mortality: Chile's 6.2 per 1,000 compared to South Sudan's 72.6 per 1,000 represents a 91% gap. The most significant difference between Chile and South Sudan is in life expectancy: Chile's 81.2 years compared to South Sudan's 57.6 years represents a 29% gap. The most significant difference between Chile and South Sudan is in population: Chile's 20.2M compared to South Sudan's 15.8M represents a 22% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Chile's high-income economy and South Sudan's low-income economy.
Chile is 1.0x more densely populated than South Sudan (27 vs 25 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. South Sudan's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Chile live an average of 23.6 years longer than those of South Sudan (81.2 vs 57.6 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
For family travel, Chile generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (6.2 vs 72.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. South Sudan offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Chile's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Chile is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $16,709.889 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Chile can expect to spend significantly less per day than in South Sudan. However, South Sudan may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Chile's life expectancy of 81.2 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. South Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
For digital nomads choosing between Chile and South Sudan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Chile spans 2 timezones while South Sudan covers 1. Cost of living varies by city in both countries. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Chile is larger by population, with 20.2M residents compared to South Sudan's 15.8M. Chile is 1.3 times more populous than South Sudan.
GDP data is not available for South Sudan. Please refer to the World Bank for the most current figures.
Chile has a higher life expectancy at 81.2 years, compared to South Sudan's 57.6 years. The gap between the two countries is 23.6 years. Chile's life expectancy is 9.2 years above the global average of 72 years, while South Sudan's is 14.4 years below the global average of 72 years.
Chile is larger by land area, covering 756,102 km² compared to South Sudan's 619,745 km². Chile is 1.2 times larger than South Sudan.
Chile recognizes the following official language: Spanish. South Sudan recognizes: English. The two countries do not share an official language.
Chile has lower inflation at 4.3%, compared to South Sudan's 91.4%. Chile's inflation is moderately elevated above the global median of 3.5%, while South Sudan's rate is severely elevated at 91.4%, a rate that erodes household purchasing power.
For family travel, Chile generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (6.2 vs 72.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. South Sudan offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both count...
Chile is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $16,709.889 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Chile can expect to spend significantly less per day than in South Sudan. However, South Sudan may offer better ...
Chile's life expectancy of 81.2 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. South Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, cli...
For digital nomads choosing between Chile and South Sudan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Chile spans 2 timezones while South Sudan covers 1. Cost of living varies by city in both countries. Both countries have gro...