Namibia has a population of 3.0M, compared to Russia's 146.0M. Russia is 48.3 times more populous than Namibia. Economically, Russia ($2.17T) has a GDP 162.6 times larger than Namibia's ($13.4B). Russia covers 17,098,246 km², 20.7 times larger than Namibia's 825,615 km². Life expectancy in Russia stands at 73.3 years, 5.9 years higher than Namibia's 67.4 years.
| Population | 3.0M | 146.0M |
| Area | 825,615 km² | 17,098,246 km² |
| GDP | $13.4B | $2.17T |
| GDP Per Capita | $4,413.128 | $14,889.019 |
| Life Expectancy | 67.4 yrs | 73.3 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 38.4 | 3.7 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 19.3% | 2.1% |
| Capital | Windhoek | Moscow |
| Region | Africa | Europe |
| Languages | Afrikaans, German, English, Herero, Khoekhoe, Kwangali, Lozi, Ndonga, Tswana | Russian |
| Currencies | NAD ($), ZAR (R) | RUB (₽) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Russia is 48.3 times more populous than Namibia, with 146.0M residents compared to 3.0M. Namibia is a nation of 3.0M people, while Russia is among the world's 15 most populous countries. In terms of population density, Namibia averages 4 people per km² (sparse), while Russia averages 9 people per km² (sparse). Russia has grown at 0.00% annually over the past decade. Population growth data is not available for Namibia.
Namibia is classified as a lower-middle-income economy, while Russia is classified as a high-income economy. The Russia economy ($2.17T) is 162.6 times larger than Namibia's ($13.4B). Namibia's GDP per capita of $4,413.128 is 101% above the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Russia's GDP per capita of $14,889.019 is 47% below the regional average of 28,000 for Europe. On a per-capita basis, residents of Russia are on average 3.4 times wealthier than those in Namibia.
Life expectancy in Namibia is 67.4 years, compared to 73.3 years in Russia, a gap of 5.9 years. Russia (73.3 years) is 1.3 years above the global average of 72 years, while Namibia (67.4 years) is 4.6 years below the global average of 72 years. At 38.4 deaths per 1,000 live births, Namibia's infant mortality is 938% higher than Russia's 3.7.
Russia (17,098,246 km²) is 20.7 times larger by land area than Namibia (825,615 km²). Namibia shares borders with 4 countries, while Russia borders 14 countries. Namibia spans 1 timezone, compared to Russia's 9 timezones. Namibia lies in Africa, while Russia is located in Europe and Asia. Namibia is categorized within the Africa region (Southern Africa), whereas Russia belongs to Europe (Eastern Europe).
The most significant difference between Namibia and Russia is in GDP: Namibia's $13.4B compared to Russia's $2.17T represents a 99% gap. The most significant difference between Namibia and Russia is in population: Namibia's 3.0M compared to Russia's 146.0M represents a 98% gap. The most significant difference between Namibia and Russia is in land area: Namibia's 825,615 km² compared to Russia's 17,098,246 km² represents a 95% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Namibia's lower-middle-income economy and Russia's high-income economy.
Russia has a GDP per capita of $14,889.019, which is 3.4x that of Namibia ($4,413.128). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Russia is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Russia is 2.3x more densely populated than Namibia (9 vs 4 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Namibia's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Russia live an average of 5.9 years longer than those of Namibia (73.3 vs 67.4 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Russia's economy grew at 4.3% compared to Namibia's 3.7%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Russia has a modest edge in economic dynamism.
For family travel, Russia generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (3.7 vs 38.4 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Namibia offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Russia's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Namibia is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $4,413.128 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Namibia can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Russia. However, Russia may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Russia's life expectancy of 73.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Namibia may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Russia's GDP per capita is 3.4x that of Namibia, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Russia, while Namibia offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Namibia can approach or exceed average costs in Russia's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Namibia and Russia, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Namibia spans 1 timezone while Russia covers 9. Namibia's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Russia is larger by population, with 146.0M residents compared to Namibia's 3.0M. Russia is 48.3 times more populous than Namibia.
Russia has the higher GDP at $2.17T, compared to Namibia's $13.4B. Russia's economy is 162.6 times larger.
Russia has a higher life expectancy at 73.3 years, compared to Namibia's 67.4 years. The gap between the two countries is 5.9 years. Namibia's life expectancy is 4.6 years below the global average of 72 years, while Russia's is 1.3 years above the global average of 72 years.
Russia is larger by land area, covering 17,098,246 km² compared to Namibia's 825,615 km². Russia is 20.7 times larger than Namibia.
Namibia recognizes the following languages: Afrikaans, German, English, Herero, Khoekhoe, Kwangali, Lozi, Ndonga, Tswana. Russia recognizes: Russian. The two countries do not share an official language.
Namibia has lower inflation at 4.2%, compared to Russia's 8.4%. Namibia's inflation is moderately elevated above the global median of 3.5%, while Russia's rate is significantly above stable levels, at 2.4 times the global median.
For family travel, Russia generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (3.7 vs 38.4 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Namibia offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countrie...
Namibia is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $4,413.128 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Namibia can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Russia. However, Russia may offer better value i...
Russia's life expectancy of 73.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Namibia may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climat...
Russia's GDP per capita is 3.4x that of Namibia, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Russia, while Namibia offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly b...
For digital nomads choosing between Namibia and Russia, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Namibia spans 1 timezone while Russia covers 9. Namibia's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income...