Sudan vs Chile
Sudan has a population of 51.7M, compared to Chile's 20.2M. Sudan is 2.6 times more populous than Chile. Economically, Chile ($330.3B) has a GDP 6.6 times larger than Sudan's ($49.7B). Sudan covers 1,886,068 km², 2.5 times larger than Chile's 756,102 km². Life expectancy in Chile stands at 81.2 years, 14.8 years higher than Sudan's 66.3 years.
SudanChile| Population | +155.7%51.7M | -60.9%20.2M |
| Area | +149.4%1,886,068 km² | -59.9%756,102 km² |
| GDP | -85.0%$49.7B | +564.9%$330.3B |
| GDP Per Capita | -94.1%$984.608 | +1597.1%$16,709.889 |
| Life Expectancy | -18.3%66.3 yrs | +22.4%81.2 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | +532.3%39.2 | -84.2%6.2 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | — | 9.0% |
| Capital | Khartoum | Santiago |
| Region | Africa | Americas |
| Languages | Arabic, English | Spanish |
| Currencies | SDG (ج.س) | CLP ($) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Population Comparison
Sudan is 2.6 times more populous than Chile, with 51.7M residents compared to 20.2M. Sudan is among the world's 30 most populous countries, while Chile is a nation of 20.2M people. In terms of population density, Sudan averages 27 people per km² (sparse), while Chile averages 27 people per km² (sparse). Population growth rate data is not available for either country over the past decade.
Economy Comparison
Sudan is classified as a low-income economy, while Chile is classified as a high-income economy. The Chile economy ($330.3B) is 6.6 times larger than Sudan's ($49.7B). Sudan's GDP per capita of $984.608 is 55% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Chile's GDP per capita of $16,709.889 is 24% above the regional average of 13,500 for Americas. On a per-capita basis, residents of Chile are on average 17.0 times wealthier than those in Sudan.
Health & Quality of Life
Life expectancy in Sudan is 66.3 years, compared to 81.2 years in Chile, a gap of 14.8 years. Chile (81.2 years) is 9.2 years above the global average of 72 years, while Sudan (66.3 years) is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years. At 39.2 deaths per 1,000 live births, Sudan's infant mortality is 532% higher than Chile's 6.2.
Geographic Comparison
Sudan (1,886,068 km²) is 2.5 times larger by land area than Chile (756,102 km²). Sudan shares borders with 7 countries, while Chile borders 3 countries. Sudan spans 1 timezone, compared to Chile's 2 timezones. Sudan lies in Africa, while Chile is located in South America. Sudan is categorized within the Africa region (Northern Africa), whereas Chile belongs to Americas (South America).
Key Differences
The most significant difference between Sudan and Chile is in GDP per capita: Sudan's $984.608 compared to Chile's $16,709.889 represents a 94% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Chile is in GDP: Sudan's $49.7B compared to Chile's $330.3B represents a 85% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Chile is in infant mortality: Sudan's 39.2 per 1,000 compared to Chile's 6.2 per 1,000 represents a 84% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Sudan's low-income economy and Chile's high-income economy.
At a Glance: What the Numbers Mean
Living Standards
Chile has a GDP per capita of $16,709.889, which is 17.0x that of Sudan ($984.608). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Chile is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Population Density
Sudan is 1.0x more densely populated than Chile (27 vs 27 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Chile's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Healthcare and Longevity
Citizens of Chile live an average of 14.8 years longer than those of Sudan (81.2 vs 66.3 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Economic Momentum
Chile's economy grew at 2.6% compared to Sudan's -14.0%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Chile has a modest edge in economic dynamism. Sudan's negative growth indicates economic contraction.
Travel Comparison
Sudan vs Chile for Families
For family travel, Chile generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (6.2 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Chile's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Sudan vs Chile for Budget Travelers
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Chile. However, Chile may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Sudan vs Chile for Retirees
Chile's life expectancy of 81.2 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Sudan vs Chile Cost of Living
Chile's GDP per capita is 17.0x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Chile, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Sudan can approach or exceed average costs in Chile's smaller cities.
Sudan vs Chile for Digital Nomads
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Chile, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Chile covers 2. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is bigger, Sudan or Chile by population?
Sudan is larger by population, with 51.7M residents compared to Chile's 20.2M. Sudan is 2.6 times more populous than Chile.
Which country has a higher GDP, Sudan or Chile?
Chile has the higher GDP at $330.3B, compared to Sudan's $49.7B. Chile's economy is 6.6 times larger.
How does life expectancy compare between Sudan and Chile?
Chile has a higher life expectancy at 81.2 years, compared to Sudan's 66.3 years. The gap between the two countries is 14.8 years. Sudan's life expectancy is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years, while Chile's is 9.2 years above the global average of 72 years.
Which country is larger by area, Sudan or Chile?
Sudan is larger by land area, covering 1,886,068 km² compared to Chile's 756,102 km². Sudan is 2.5 times larger than Chile.
What languages are spoken in Sudan and Chile?
Sudan recognizes the following languages: Arabic, English. Chile recognizes: Spanish. The two countries do not share an official language.
Which country has lower inflation, Sudan or Chile?
Inflation data is not available for Sudan. Chile's inflation rate is 4.3%.
Is Sudan or Chile better for a family holiday?
For family travel, Chile generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (6.2 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attra...
Is Sudan or Chile cheaper to visit?
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Chile. However, Chile may offer better value in specif...
Is Sudan or Chile better for retirement?
Chile's life expectancy of 81.2 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate p...
Is Sudan or Chile more expensive to live in?
Chile's GDP per capita is 17.0x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Chile, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by cit...
Is Sudan or Chile better for digital nomads?
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Chile, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Chile covers 2. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both c...