Sudan vs Malawi
Sudan has a population of 51.7M, compared to Malawi's 20.7M. Sudan is 2.5 times more populous than Malawi. Economically, Sudan ($49.7B) has a GDP 4.4 times larger than Malawi's ($11.3B). Sudan covers 1,886,068 km², 15.9 times larger than Malawi's 118,484 km². Life expectancy in Malawi stands at 67.4 years, 1.0 years higher than Sudan's 66.3 years.
SudanMalawi| Population | +149.2%51.7M | -59.9%20.7M |
| Area | +1491.8%1,886,068 km² | -93.7%118,484 km² |
| GDP | +338.9%$49.7B | -77.2%$11.3B |
| GDP Per Capita | +88.4%$984.608 | -46.9%$522.57 |
| Life Expectancy | -1.5%66.3 yrs | +1.5%67.4 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | +33.3%39.2 | -25.0%29.4 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | — | 5.1% |
| Capital | Khartoum | Lilongwe |
| Region | Africa | Africa |
| Languages | Arabic, English | English, Chewa |
| Currencies | SDG (ج.س) | MWK (MK) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Population Comparison
Sudan is 2.5 times more populous than Malawi, with 51.7M residents compared to 20.7M. Sudan is among the world's 30 most populous countries, while Malawi is a nation of 20.7M people. In terms of population density, Sudan averages 27 people per km² (sparse), while Malawi averages 175 people per km² (moderate). Population growth rate data is not available for either country over the past decade.
Economy Comparison
Sudan is classified as a low-income economy, while Malawi is classified as a low-income economy. The Sudan economy ($49.7B) is 4.4 times larger than Malawi's ($11.3B). Sudan's GDP per capita of $984.608 is 55% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Malawi's GDP per capita of $522.57 is 76% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. On a per-capita basis, residents of Sudan are on average 1.9 times wealthier than those in Malawi.
Health & Quality of Life
Life expectancy in Sudan is 66.3 years, compared to 67.4 years in Malawi, a gap of 1.0 years. Malawi (67.4 years) is 4.6 years below the global average of 72 years, while Sudan (66.3 years) is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years. At 39.2 deaths per 1,000 live births, Sudan's infant mortality is 33% higher than Malawi's 29.4.
Geographic Comparison
Sudan (1,886,068 km²) is 15.9 times larger by land area than Malawi (118,484 km²). Sudan shares borders with 7 countries, while Malawi borders 3 countries. Sudan spans 1 timezone, compared to Malawi's 1 timezone. Both Sudan and Malawi are located in Africa. Both countries fall within the Africa region, though they occupy different subregions: Northern Africa and Eastern Africa.
Key Differences
The most significant difference between Sudan and Malawi is in land area: Sudan's 1,886,068 km² compared to Malawi's 118,484 km² represents a 94% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Malawi is in GDP: Sudan's $49.7B compared to Malawi's $11.3B represents a 77% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Malawi is in population: Sudan's 51.7M compared to Malawi's 20.7M represents a 60% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Sudan's low-income economy and Malawi's low-income economy.
At a Glance: What the Numbers Mean
Living Standards
Sudan has a GDP per capita of $984.608, which is 1.9x that of Malawi ($522.57). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Sudan is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Population Density
Malawi is 6.4x more densely populated than Sudan (175 vs 27 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Sudan's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Healthcare and Longevity
Citizens of Malawi live an average of 1.0 years longer than those of Sudan (67.4 vs 66.3 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a moderate difference that could narrow with continued development.
Economic Momentum
Malawi's economy grew at 1.7% compared to Sudan's -14.0%. Both economies are growing slowly, which may reflect maturity or structural challenges. Sudan's negative growth indicates economic contraction.
Travel Comparison
Sudan vs Malawi for Families
For family travel, Malawi generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (29.4 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Malawi's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Sudan vs Malawi for Budget Travelers
Malawi is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $522.57 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Malawi can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sudan. However, Sudan may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Sudan vs Malawi for Retirees
Malawi's life expectancy of 67.4 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Sudan vs Malawi Cost of Living
Sudan's GDP per capita is 1.9x that of Malawi, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sudan, while Malawi offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Malawi can approach or exceed average costs in Sudan's smaller cities.
Sudan vs Malawi for Digital Nomads
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Malawi, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Malawi covers 1. Malawi's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is bigger, Sudan or Malawi by population?
Sudan is larger by population, with 51.7M residents compared to Malawi's 20.7M. Sudan is 2.5 times more populous than Malawi.
Which country has a higher GDP, Sudan or Malawi?
Sudan has the higher GDP at $49.7B, compared to Malawi's $11.3B. Sudan's economy is 4.4 times larger.
How does life expectancy compare between Sudan and Malawi?
Malawi has a higher life expectancy at 67.4 years, compared to Sudan's 66.3 years. The gap between the two countries is 1.0 years. Sudan's life expectancy is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years, while Malawi's is 4.6 years below the global average of 72 years.
Which country is larger by area, Sudan or Malawi?
Sudan is larger by land area, covering 1,886,068 km² compared to Malawi's 118,484 km². Sudan is 15.9 times larger than Malawi.
What languages are spoken in Sudan and Malawi?
Sudan recognizes the following languages: Arabic, English. Malawi recognizes: English, Chewa. Both countries share at least one common language.
Which country has lower inflation, Sudan or Malawi?
Inflation data is not available for Sudan. Malawi's inflation rate is 32.2%.
Is Sudan or Malawi better for a family holiday?
For family travel, Malawi generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (29.4 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly att...
Is Sudan or Malawi cheaper to visit?
Malawi is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $522.57 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Malawi can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sudan. However, Sudan may offer better value in speci...
Is Sudan or Malawi better for retirement?
Malawi's life expectancy of 67.4 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate ...
Is Sudan or Malawi more expensive to live in?
Sudan's GDP per capita is 1.9x that of Malawi, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sudan, while Malawi offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by ci...
Is Sudan or Malawi better for digital nomads?
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Malawi, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Malawi covers 1. Malawi's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Bot...