Sudan vs Zimbabwe
Sudan has a population of 51.7M, compared to Zimbabwe's 17.1M. Sudan is 3.0 times more populous than Zimbabwe. Economically, Sudan ($49.7B) has a GDP 1.2 times larger than Zimbabwe's ($41.5B). Sudan covers 1,886,068 km², 4.8 times larger than Zimbabwe's 390,757 km². Life expectancy in Sudan stands at 66.3 years, 3.6 years higher than Zimbabwe's 62.8 years.
SudanZimbabwe| Population | +202.6%51.7M | -67.0%17.1M |
| Area | +382.7%1,886,068 km² | -79.3%390,757 km² |
| GDP | +19.6%$49.7B | -16.4%$41.5B |
| GDP Per Capita | -60.6%$984.608 | +153.6%$2,497.203 |
| Life Expectancy | +5.7%66.3 yrs | -5.4%62.8 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | -3.4%39.2 | +3.6%40.6 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | — | 9.3% |
| Capital | Khartoum | Harare |
| Region | Africa | Africa |
| Languages | Arabic, English | Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Khoisan, Ndau, Northern Ndebele, Chewa, Shona, Sotho, Tonga, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zimbabwean Sign Language |
| Currencies | SDG (ج.س) | ZWL ($) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Population Comparison
Sudan is 3.0 times more populous than Zimbabwe, with 51.7M residents compared to 17.1M. Sudan is among the world's 30 most populous countries, while Zimbabwe is a nation of 17.1M people. In terms of population density, Sudan averages 27 people per km² (sparse), while Zimbabwe averages 44 people per km² (sparse). Zimbabwe has grown at 1.55% annually over the past decade. Population growth data is not available for Sudan.
Economy Comparison
Sudan is classified as a low-income economy, while Zimbabwe is classified as a lower-middle-income economy. The Sudan economy ($49.7B) is 1.2 times larger than Zimbabwe's ($41.5B). Sudan's GDP per capita of $984.608 is 55% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Zimbabwe's GDP per capita of $2,497.203 is 14% above the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. On a per-capita basis, residents of Zimbabwe are on average 2.5 times wealthier than those in Sudan.
Health & Quality of Life
Life expectancy in Sudan is 66.3 years, compared to 62.8 years in Zimbabwe, a gap of 3.6 years. Sudan (66.3 years) is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years, while Zimbabwe (62.8 years) is 9.2 years below the global average of 72 years. At 40.6 deaths per 1,000 live births, Zimbabwe's infant mortality is 4% higher than Sudan's 39.2.
Geographic Comparison
Sudan (1,886,068 km²) is 4.8 times larger by land area than Zimbabwe (390,757 km²). Sudan shares borders with 7 countries, while Zimbabwe borders 4 countries. Sudan spans 1 timezone, compared to Zimbabwe's 1 timezone. Both Sudan and Zimbabwe are located in Africa. Both countries fall within the Africa region, though they occupy different subregions: Northern Africa and Southern Africa.
Key Differences
The most significant difference between Sudan and Zimbabwe is in land area: Sudan's 1,886,068 km² compared to Zimbabwe's 390,757 km² represents a 79% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Zimbabwe is in population: Sudan's 51.7M compared to Zimbabwe's 17.1M represents a 67% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Zimbabwe is in GDP per capita: Sudan's $984.608 compared to Zimbabwe's $2,497.203 represents a 61% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Sudan's low-income economy and Zimbabwe's lower-middle-income economy.
At a Glance: What the Numbers Mean
Living Standards
Zimbabwe has a GDP per capita of $2,497.203, which is 2.5x that of Sudan ($984.608). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Zimbabwe is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Population Density
Zimbabwe is 1.6x more densely populated than Sudan (44 vs 27 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Sudan's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Healthcare and Longevity
Citizens of Sudan live an average of 3.6 years longer than those of Zimbabwe (66.3 vs 62.8 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a moderate difference that could narrow with continued development.
Economic Momentum
Zimbabwe's economy grew at 1.7% compared to Sudan's -14.0%. Both economies are growing slowly, which may reflect maturity or structural challenges. Sudan's negative growth indicates economic contraction.
Travel Comparison
Sudan vs Zimbabwe for Families
For family travel, Sudan generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (39.2 vs 40.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Zimbabwe offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Sudan's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Sudan vs Zimbabwe for Budget Travelers
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Zimbabwe. However, Zimbabwe may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Sudan vs Zimbabwe for Retirees
Sudan's life expectancy of 66.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Zimbabwe may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Sudan vs Zimbabwe Cost of Living
Zimbabwe's GDP per capita is 2.5x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Zimbabwe, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Sudan can approach or exceed average costs in Zimbabwe's smaller cities.
Sudan vs Zimbabwe for Digital Nomads
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Zimbabwe, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Zimbabwe covers 1. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is bigger, Sudan or Zimbabwe by population?
Sudan is larger by population, with 51.7M residents compared to Zimbabwe's 17.1M. Sudan is 3.0 times more populous than Zimbabwe.
Which country has a higher GDP, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Sudan has the higher GDP at $49.7B, compared to Zimbabwe's $41.5B. Sudan's economy is 1.2 times larger.
How does life expectancy compare between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
Sudan has a higher life expectancy at 66.3 years, compared to Zimbabwe's 62.8 years. The gap between the two countries is 3.6 years. Sudan's life expectancy is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years, while Zimbabwe's is 9.2 years below the global average of 72 years.
Which country is larger by area, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Sudan is larger by land area, covering 1,886,068 km² compared to Zimbabwe's 390,757 km². Sudan is 4.8 times larger than Zimbabwe.
What languages are spoken in Sudan and Zimbabwe?
Sudan recognizes the following languages: Arabic, English. Zimbabwe recognizes: Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Khoisan, Ndau, Northern Ndebele, Chewa, Shona, Sotho, Tonga, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zimbabwean Sign Language. Both countries share at least one common language.
Which country has lower inflation, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
Inflation data is not available for Sudan or Zimbabwe.
Is Sudan or Zimbabwe better for a family holiday?
For family travel, Sudan generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (39.2 vs 40.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Zimbabwe offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countri...
Is Sudan or Zimbabwe cheaper to visit?
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Zimbabwe. However, Zimbabwe may offer better value in ...
Is Sudan or Zimbabwe better for retirement?
Sudan's life expectancy of 66.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Zimbabwe may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climat...
Is Sudan or Zimbabwe more expensive to live in?
Zimbabwe's GDP per capita is 2.5x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Zimbabwe, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly b...
Is Sudan or Zimbabwe better for digital nomads?
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Zimbabwe, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Zimbabwe covers 1. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. ...