Iceland has a population of 392K, compared to Pakistan's 241.5M. Pakistan is 616.4 times more populous than Iceland. Economically, Pakistan ($371.6B) has a GDP 11.2 times larger than Iceland's ($33.3B). Pakistan covers 796,095 km², 7.7 times larger than Iceland's 103,000 km². Life expectancy in Iceland stands at 82.6 years, 15.0 years higher than Pakistan's 67.6 years.
| Population | 392K | 241.5M |
| Area | 103,000 km² | 796,095 km² |
| GDP | $33.3B | $371.6B |
| GDP Per Capita | $86,040.531 | $1,478.773 |
| Life Expectancy | 82.6 yrs | 67.6 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 1.9 | 50.1 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 3.6% | 5.4% |
| Capital | Reykjavik | Islamabad |
| Region | Europe | Asia |
| Languages | Icelandic | English, Urdu |
| Currencies | ISK (kr) | PKR (₨) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Pakistan is 616.4 times more populous than Iceland, with 241.5M residents compared to 392K. Iceland is a nation of 392K people, while Pakistan is among the world's 15 most populous countries. In terms of population density, Iceland averages 4 people per km² (sparse), while Pakistan averages 303 people per km² (dense). Population growth rate data is not available for either country over the past decade.
Iceland is classified as a high-income economy, while Pakistan is classified as a lower-middle-income economy. The Pakistan economy ($371.6B) is 11.2 times larger than Iceland's ($33.3B). Iceland's GDP per capita of $86,040.531 is 207% above the regional average of 28,000 for Europe. Pakistan's GDP per capita of $1,478.773 is 87% below the regional average of 11,200 for Asia. On a per-capita basis, residents of Iceland are on average 58.2 times wealthier than those in Pakistan.
Life expectancy in Iceland is 82.6 years, compared to 67.6 years in Pakistan, a gap of 15.0 years. Iceland (82.6 years) is 10.6 years above the global average of 72 years, while Pakistan (67.6 years) is 4.4 years below the global average of 72 years. At 50.1 deaths per 1,000 live births, Pakistan's infant mortality is 2537% higher than Iceland's 1.9.
Pakistan (796,095 km²) is 7.7 times larger by land area than Iceland (103,000 km²). Iceland shares borders with 0 countries, while Pakistan borders 4 countries. Iceland spans 1 timezone, compared to Pakistan's 1 timezone. Iceland lies in Europe, while Pakistan is located in Asia. Iceland is categorized within the Europe region (Northern Europe), whereas Pakistan belongs to Asia (Southern Asia).
The most significant difference between Iceland and Pakistan is in population: Iceland's 392K compared to Pakistan's 241.5M represents a 100% gap. The most significant difference between Iceland and Pakistan is in GDP per capita: Iceland's $86,040.531 compared to Pakistan's $1,478.773 represents a 98% gap. The most significant difference between Iceland and Pakistan is in infant mortality: Iceland's 1.9 per 1,000 compared to Pakistan's 50.1 per 1,000 represents a 96% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Iceland's high-income economy and Pakistan's lower-middle-income economy.
Iceland has a GDP per capita of $86,040.531, which is 58.2x that of Pakistan ($1,478.773). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Iceland is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Pakistan is 79.7x more densely populated than Iceland (303 vs 4 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Iceland's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Iceland live an average of 15.0 years longer than those of Pakistan (82.6 vs 67.6 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Pakistan's economy grew at 3.0% compared to Iceland's -1.0%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Pakistan has a modest edge in economic dynamism. Iceland's negative growth indicates economic contraction.
For family travel, Iceland generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (1.9 vs 50.1 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Pakistan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Iceland's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Pakistan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $1,478.773 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Pakistan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Iceland. However, Iceland may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Iceland's life expectancy of 82.6 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Pakistan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Iceland's GDP per capita is 58.2x that of Pakistan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Iceland, while Pakistan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Pakistan can approach or exceed average costs in Iceland's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Iceland and Pakistan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Iceland spans 1 timezone while Pakistan covers 1. Pakistan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Pakistan is larger by population, with 241.5M residents compared to Iceland's 392K. Pakistan is 616.4 times more populous than Iceland.
Pakistan has the higher GDP at $371.6B, compared to Iceland's $33.3B. Pakistan's economy is 11.2 times larger.
Iceland has a higher life expectancy at 82.6 years, compared to Pakistan's 67.6 years. The gap between the two countries is 15.0 years. Iceland's life expectancy is 10.6 years above the global average of 72 years, while Pakistan's is 4.4 years below the global average of 72 years.
Pakistan is larger by land area, covering 796,095 km² compared to Iceland's 103,000 km². Pakistan is 7.7 times larger than Iceland.
Iceland recognizes the following official language: Icelandic. Pakistan recognizes: English, Urdu. The two countries do not share an official language.
Iceland has lower inflation at 5.9%, compared to Pakistan's 12.6%. Iceland's inflation is moderately elevated above the global median of 3.5%, while Pakistan's rate is significantly above stable levels, at 3.6 times the global median.
For family travel, Iceland generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (1.9 vs 50.1 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Pakistan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly ...
Pakistan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $1,478.773 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Pakistan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Iceland. However, Iceland may offer better val...
Iceland's life expectancy of 82.6 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Pakistan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, clim...
Iceland's GDP per capita is 58.2x that of Pakistan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Iceland, while Pakistan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significan...
For digital nomads choosing between Iceland and Pakistan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Iceland spans 1 timezone while Pakistan covers 1. Pakistan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote i...