Pakistan has a population of 241.5M, compared to Egypt's 107.3M. Pakistan is 2.3 times more populous than Egypt. Economically, Egypt ($389.1B) has a GDP 1.0 times larger than Pakistan's ($371.6B). Egypt covers 1,002,450 km², 1.3 times larger than Pakistan's 796,095 km². Life expectancy in Egypt stands at 71.6 years, 4.0 years higher than Pakistan's 67.6 years.
| Population | 241.5M | 107.3M |
| Area | 796,095 km² | 1,002,450 km² |
| GDP | $371.6B | $389.1B |
| GDP Per Capita | $1,478.773 | $3,338.474 |
| Life Expectancy | 67.6 yrs | 71.6 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 50.1 | 16.1 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 5.4% | 6.8% |
| Capital | Islamabad | Cairo |
| Region | Asia | Africa |
| Languages | English, Urdu | Arabic |
| Currencies | PKR (₨) | EGP (£) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Pakistan is 2.3 times more populous than Egypt, with 241.5M residents compared to 107.3M. Pakistan is among the world's 15 most populous countries, while Egypt is among the world's 15 most populous countries. In terms of population density, Pakistan averages 303 people per km² (dense), while Egypt averages 107 people per km² (moderate). Egypt has grown at 1.85% annually over the past decade. Population growth data is not available for Pakistan.
Pakistan is classified as a lower-middle-income economy, while Egypt is classified as a lower-middle-income economy. The Egypt economy ($389.1B) is 1.0 times larger than Pakistan's ($371.6B). Pakistan's GDP per capita of $1,478.773 is 87% below the regional average of 11,200 for Asia. Egypt's GDP per capita of $3,338.474 is 52% above the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. On a per-capita basis, residents of Egypt are on average 2.3 times wealthier than those in Pakistan.
Life expectancy in Pakistan is 67.6 years, compared to 71.6 years in Egypt, a gap of 4.0 years. Egypt (71.6 years) is at the global average of 72 years, while Pakistan (67.6 years) is 4.4 years below the global average of 72 years. At 50.1 deaths per 1,000 live births, Pakistan's infant mortality is 211% higher than Egypt's 16.1.
Egypt (1,002,450 km²) is 1.3 times larger by land area than Pakistan (796,095 km²). Pakistan shares borders with 4 countries, while Egypt borders 4 countries. Pakistan spans 1 timezone, compared to Egypt's 1 timezone. Pakistan lies in Asia, while Egypt is located in Africa. Pakistan is categorized within the Asia region (Southern Asia), whereas Egypt belongs to Africa (Northern Africa).
The most significant difference between Pakistan and Egypt is in infant mortality: Pakistan's 50.1 per 1,000 compared to Egypt's 16.1 per 1,000 represents a 68% gap. The most significant difference between Pakistan and Egypt is in GDP per capita: Pakistan's $1,478.773 compared to Egypt's $3,338.474 represents a 56% gap. The most significant difference between Pakistan and Egypt is in population: Pakistan's 241.5M compared to Egypt's 107.3M represents a 56% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Pakistan's lower-middle-income economy and Egypt's lower-middle-income economy.
Egypt has a GDP per capita of $3,338.474, which is 2.3x that of Pakistan ($1,478.773). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Egypt is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Pakistan is 2.8x more densely populated than Egypt (303 vs 107 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Egypt's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Egypt live an average of 4.0 years longer than those of Pakistan (71.6 vs 67.6 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a moderate difference that could narrow with continued development.
Pakistan's economy grew at 3.0% compared to Egypt's 2.4%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Pakistan has a modest edge in economic dynamism.
For family travel, Egypt generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (16.1 vs 50.1 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Pakistan offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Egypt's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Pakistan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $1,478.773 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Pakistan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Egypt. However, Egypt may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Egypt's life expectancy of 71.6 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Pakistan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Egypt's GDP per capita is 2.3x that of Pakistan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Egypt, while Pakistan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Pakistan can approach or exceed average costs in Egypt's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Pakistan and Egypt, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Pakistan spans 1 timezone while Egypt covers 1. Pakistan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Pakistan is larger by population, with 241.5M residents compared to Egypt's 107.3M. Pakistan is 2.3 times more populous than Egypt.
Egypt has the higher GDP at $389.1B, compared to Pakistan's $371.6B. Egypt's economy is 1.0 times larger.
Egypt has a higher life expectancy at 71.6 years, compared to Pakistan's 67.6 years. The gap between the two countries is 4.0 years. Pakistan's life expectancy is 4.4 years below the global average of 72 years, while Egypt's is at the global average of 72 years.
Egypt is larger by land area, covering 1,002,450 km² compared to Pakistan's 796,095 km². Egypt is 1.3 times larger than Pakistan.
Pakistan recognizes the following languages: English, Urdu. Egypt recognizes: Arabic. The two countries do not share an official language.
Pakistan has lower inflation at 12.6%, compared to Egypt's 28.3%. Pakistan's inflation is significantly above stable levels, at 3.6 times the global median, while Egypt's rate is severely elevated at 28.3%, a rate that erodes household purchasing power.
For family travel, Egypt generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (16.1 vs 50.1 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Pakistan offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countri...
Pakistan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $1,478.773 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Pakistan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Egypt. However, Egypt may offer better value i...
Egypt's life expectancy of 71.6 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Pakistan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climat...
Egypt's GDP per capita is 2.3x that of Pakistan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Egypt, while Pakistan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly b...
For digital nomads choosing between Pakistan and Egypt, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Pakistan spans 1 timezone while Egypt covers 1. Pakistan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote incom...