South Africa has a population of 63.1M, compared to Zimbabwe's 17.1M. South Africa is 3.7 times more populous than Zimbabwe. Economically, South Africa ($401.1B) has a GDP 9.7 times larger than Zimbabwe's ($41.5B). South Africa covers 1,221,037 km², 3.1 times larger than Zimbabwe's 390,757 km². Life expectancy in South Africa stands at 66.1 years, 3.4 years higher than Zimbabwe's 62.8 years.
| Population | 63.1M | 17.1M |
| Area | 1,221,037 km² | 390,757 km² |
| GDP | $401.1B | $41.5B |
| GDP Per Capita | $6,267.187 | $2,497.203 |
| Life Expectancy | 66.1 yrs | 62.8 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 24.4 | 40.6 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 32.4% | 9.3% |
| Capital | Pretoria | Harare |
| Region | Africa | Africa |
| Languages | Afrikaans, English, Southern Ndebele, Northern Sotho, Southern Sotho, Swazi, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zulu | Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Khoisan, Ndau, Northern Ndebele, Chewa, Shona, Sotho, Tonga, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zimbabwean Sign Language |
| Currencies | ZAR (R) | ZWL ($) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
South Africa is 3.7 times more populous than Zimbabwe, with 63.1M residents compared to 17.1M. South Africa is among the world's 30 most populous countries, while Zimbabwe is a nation of 17.1M people. In terms of population density, South Africa averages 52 people per km² (moderate), while Zimbabwe averages 44 people per km² (sparse). Zimbabwe has grown at 1.55% annually over the past decade. Population growth data is not available for South Africa.
South Africa is classified as a upper-middle-income economy, while Zimbabwe is classified as a lower-middle-income economy. The South Africa economy ($401.1B) is 9.7 times larger than Zimbabwe's ($41.5B). South Africa's GDP per capita of $6,267.187 is 185% above the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Zimbabwe's GDP per capita of $2,497.203 is 14% above the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. On a per-capita basis, residents of South Africa are on average 2.5 times wealthier than those in Zimbabwe.
Life expectancy in South Africa is 66.1 years, compared to 62.8 years in Zimbabwe, a gap of 3.4 years. South Africa (66.1 years) is 5.9 years below the global average of 72 years, while Zimbabwe (62.8 years) is 9.2 years below the global average of 72 years. At 40.6 deaths per 1,000 live births, Zimbabwe's infant mortality is 66% higher than South Africa's 24.4.
South Africa (1,221,037 km²) is 3.1 times larger by land area than Zimbabwe (390,757 km²). South Africa shares borders with 6 countries, while Zimbabwe borders 4 countries. South Africa spans 1 timezone, compared to Zimbabwe's 1 timezone. Both South Africa and Zimbabwe are located in Africa. Both countries fall within the Africa region, though they occupy different subregions: Southern Africa and Southern Africa.
The most significant difference between South Africa and Zimbabwe is in GDP: South Africa's $401.1B compared to Zimbabwe's $41.5B represents a 90% gap. The most significant difference between South Africa and Zimbabwe is in population: South Africa's 63.1M compared to Zimbabwe's 17.1M represents a 73% gap. The most significant difference between South Africa and Zimbabwe is in land area: South Africa's 1,221,037 km² compared to Zimbabwe's 390,757 km² represents a 68% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between South Africa's upper-middle-income economy and Zimbabwe's lower-middle-income economy.
South Africa has a GDP per capita of $6,267.187, which is 2.5x that of Zimbabwe ($2,497.203). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in South Africa is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
South Africa is 1.2x more densely populated than Zimbabwe (52 vs 44 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Zimbabwe's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of South Africa live an average of 3.4 years longer than those of Zimbabwe (66.1 vs 62.8 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a moderate difference that could narrow with continued development.
Zimbabwe's economy grew at 1.7% compared to South Africa's 0.5%. Both economies are growing slowly, which may reflect maturity or structural challenges.
For family travel, South Africa generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (24.4 vs 40.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Zimbabwe offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though South Africa's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Zimbabwe is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,497.203 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Zimbabwe can expect to spend significantly less per day than in South Africa. However, South Africa may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
South Africa's life expectancy of 66.1 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Zimbabwe may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
South Africa's GDP per capita is 2.5x that of Zimbabwe, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in South Africa, while Zimbabwe offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Zimbabwe can approach or exceed average costs in South Africa's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between South Africa and Zimbabwe, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. South Africa spans 1 timezone while Zimbabwe covers 1. Zimbabwe's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
South Africa is larger by population, with 63.1M residents compared to Zimbabwe's 17.1M. South Africa is 3.7 times more populous than Zimbabwe.
South Africa has the higher GDP at $401.1B, compared to Zimbabwe's $41.5B. South Africa's economy is 9.7 times larger.
South Africa has a higher life expectancy at 66.1 years, compared to Zimbabwe's 62.8 years. The gap between the two countries is 3.4 years. South Africa's life expectancy is 5.9 years below the global average of 72 years, while Zimbabwe's is 9.2 years below the global average of 72 years.
South Africa is larger by land area, covering 1,221,037 km² compared to Zimbabwe's 390,757 km². South Africa is 3.1 times larger than Zimbabwe.
South Africa recognizes the following languages: Afrikaans, English, Southern Ndebele, Northern Sotho, Southern Sotho, Swazi, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zulu. Zimbabwe recognizes: Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Khoisan, Ndau, Northern Ndebele, Chewa, Shona, Sotho, Tonga, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zimbabwean Sign Language. Both countries share at least one common language.
Inflation data is not available for Zimbabwe. South Africa's inflation rate is 4.4%.
For family travel, South Africa generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (24.4 vs 40.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Zimbabwe offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both ...
Zimbabwe is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,497.203 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Zimbabwe can expect to spend significantly less per day than in South Africa. However, South Africa may offer ...
South Africa's life expectancy of 66.1 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Zimbabwe may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access,...
South Africa's GDP per capita is 2.5x that of Zimbabwe, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in South Africa, while Zimbabwe offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies s...
For digital nomads choosing between South Africa and Zimbabwe, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. South Africa spans 1 timezone while Zimbabwe covers 1. Zimbabwe's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretchin...