Sri Lanka has a population of 21.8M, compared to Ecuador's 18.1M. Sri Lanka is 1.2 times more populous than Ecuador. Economically, Ecuador ($124.7B) has a GDP 1.3 times larger than Sri Lanka's ($99.0B). Ecuador covers 276,841 km², 4.2 times larger than Sri Lanka's 65,610 km². Life expectancy in Sri Lanka stands at 77.5 years, 0.1 years higher than Ecuador's 77.4 years.
| Population | 21.8M | 18.1M |
| Area | 65,610 km² | 276,841 km² |
| GDP | $99.0B | $124.7B |
| GDP Per Capita | $4,515.568 | $6,874.706 |
| Life Expectancy | 77.5 yrs | 77.4 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 5.3 | 11.1 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 4.0% | 3.3% |
| Capital | Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte | Quito |
| Region | Asia | Americas |
| Languages | Sinhala, Tamil | Spanish |
| Currencies | LKR (Rs රු) | USD ($) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Sri Lanka is 1.2 times more populous than Ecuador, with 21.8M residents compared to 18.1M. Sri Lanka is a nation of 21.8M people, while Ecuador is a nation of 18.1M people. In terms of population density, Sri Lanka averages 332 people per km² (dense), while Ecuador averages 65 people per km² (moderate). Ecuador has grown at 1.30% annually over the past decade. Population growth data is not available for Sri Lanka.
Sri Lanka is classified as a upper-middle-income economy, while Ecuador is classified as a upper-middle-income economy. The Ecuador economy ($124.7B) is 1.3 times larger than Sri Lanka's ($99.0B). Sri Lanka's GDP per capita of $4,515.568 is 60% below the regional average of 11,200 for Asia. Ecuador's GDP per capita of $6,874.706 is 49% below the regional average of 13,500 for Americas. On a per-capita basis, residents of Ecuador are on average 1.5 times wealthier than those in Sri Lanka.
Life expectancy in Sri Lanka is 77.5 years, compared to 77.4 years in Ecuador, a gap of 0.1 years. Sri Lanka (77.5 years) is 5.5 years above the global average of 72 years, while Ecuador (77.4 years) is 5.4 years above the global average of 72 years. At 11.1 deaths per 1,000 live births, Ecuador's infant mortality is 109% higher than Sri Lanka's 5.3.
Ecuador (276,841 km²) is 4.2 times larger by land area than Sri Lanka (65,610 km²). Sri Lanka shares borders with 0 countries, while Ecuador borders 2 countries. Sri Lanka spans 1 timezone, compared to Ecuador's 2 timezones. Sri Lanka lies in Asia, while Ecuador is located in South America. Sri Lanka is categorized within the Asia region (Southern Asia), whereas Ecuador belongs to Americas (South America).
The most significant difference between Sri Lanka and Ecuador is in land area: Sri Lanka's 65,610 km² compared to Ecuador's 276,841 km² represents a 76% gap. The most significant difference between Sri Lanka and Ecuador is in infant mortality: Sri Lanka's 5.3 per 1,000 compared to Ecuador's 11.1 per 1,000 represents a 52% gap. The most significant difference between Sri Lanka and Ecuador is in GDP per capita: Sri Lanka's $4,515.568 compared to Ecuador's $6,874.706 represents a 34% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Sri Lanka's upper-middle-income economy and Ecuador's upper-middle-income economy.
Ecuador has a GDP per capita of $6,874.706, which is 1.5x that of Sri Lanka ($4,515.568). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Ecuador is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Sri Lanka is 5.1x more densely populated than Ecuador (332 vs 65 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Ecuador's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Sri Lanka live an average of 0.1 years longer than those of Ecuador (77.5 vs 77.4 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a moderate difference that could narrow with continued development.
Sri Lanka's economy grew at 5.0% compared to Ecuador's -2.0%. Sri Lanka's high growth rate suggests a rapidly developing economy with expanding opportunities. Ecuador's negative growth indicates economic contraction.
For family travel, Sri Lanka generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (5.3 vs 11.1 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Ecuador offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Sri Lanka's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Sri Lanka is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $4,515.568 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sri Lanka can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Ecuador. However, Ecuador may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Sri Lanka's life expectancy of 77.5 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Ecuador may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Ecuador's GDP per capita is 1.5x that of Sri Lanka, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Ecuador, while Sri Lanka offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Sri Lanka can approach or exceed average costs in Ecuador's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Sri Lanka and Ecuador, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sri Lanka spans 1 timezone while Ecuador covers 2. Sri Lanka's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Sri Lanka is larger by population, with 21.8M residents compared to Ecuador's 18.1M. Sri Lanka is 1.2 times more populous than Ecuador.
Ecuador has the higher GDP at $124.7B, compared to Sri Lanka's $99.0B. Ecuador's economy is 1.3 times larger.
Sri Lanka has a higher life expectancy at 77.5 years, compared to Ecuador's 77.4 years. The gap between the two countries is 0.1 years. Sri Lanka's life expectancy is 5.5 years above the global average of 72 years, while Ecuador's is 5.4 years above the global average of 72 years.
Ecuador is larger by land area, covering 276,841 km² compared to Sri Lanka's 65,610 km². Ecuador is 4.2 times larger than Sri Lanka.
Sri Lanka recognizes the following languages: Sinhala, Tamil. Ecuador recognizes: Spanish. The two countries do not share an official language.
Sri Lanka has lower inflation at -0.4%, compared to Ecuador's 1.5%. Sri Lanka's inflation is within the 2-3% range considered stable by most central banks, while Ecuador's rate is within the 2-3% range considered stable by most central banks.
For family travel, Sri Lanka generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (5.3 vs 11.1 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Ecuador offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly...
Sri Lanka is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $4,515.568 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sri Lanka can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Ecuador. However, Ecuador may offer better v...
Sri Lanka's life expectancy of 77.5 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Ecuador may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, cli...
Ecuador's GDP per capita is 1.5x that of Sri Lanka, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Ecuador, while Sri Lanka offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significa...
For digital nomads choosing between Sri Lanka and Ecuador, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sri Lanka spans 1 timezone while Ecuador covers 2. Sri Lanka's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remot...