Sudan vs Sweden
Sudan has a population of 51.7M, compared to Sweden's 10.6M. Sudan is 4.9 times more populous than Sweden. Economically, Sweden ($603.7B) has a GDP 12.2 times larger than Sudan's ($49.7B). Sudan covers 1,886,068 km², 4.2 times larger than Sweden's 450,295 km². Life expectancy in Sweden stands at 83.3 years, 17.0 years higher than Sudan's 66.3 years.
SudanSweden| Population | +387.1%51.7M | -79.5%10.6M |
| Area | +318.9%1,886,068 km² | -76.1%450,295 km² |
| GDP | -91.8%$49.7B | +1115.4%$603.7B |
| GDP Per Capita | -98.3%$984.608 | +5701.0%$57,117.488 |
| Life Expectancy | -20.4%66.3 yrs | +25.6%83.3 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | +1860.0%39.2 | -94.9%2.0 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | — | 8.7% |
| Capital | Khartoum | Stockholm |
| Region | Africa | Europe |
| Languages | Arabic, English | Swedish |
| Currencies | SDG (ج.س) | SEK (kr) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Population Comparison
Sudan is 4.9 times more populous than Sweden, with 51.7M residents compared to 10.6M. Sudan is among the world's 30 most populous countries, while Sweden is a nation of 10.6M people. In terms of population density, Sudan averages 27 people per km² (sparse), while Sweden averages 24 people per km² (sparse). Population growth rate data is not available for either country over the past decade.
Economy Comparison
Sudan is classified as a low-income economy, while Sweden is classified as a high-income economy. The Sweden economy ($603.7B) is 12.2 times larger than Sudan's ($49.7B). Sudan's GDP per capita of $984.608 is 55% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Sweden's GDP per capita of $57,117.488 is 104% above the regional average of 28,000 for Europe. On a per-capita basis, residents of Sweden are on average 58.0 times wealthier than those in Sudan.
Health & Quality of Life
Life expectancy in Sudan is 66.3 years, compared to 83.3 years in Sweden, a gap of 17.0 years. Sweden (83.3 years) is 11.3 years above the global average of 72 years, while Sudan (66.3 years) is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years. At 39.2 deaths per 1,000 live births, Sudan's infant mortality is 1860% higher than Sweden's 2.0.
Geographic Comparison
Sudan (1,886,068 km²) is 4.2 times larger by land area than Sweden (450,295 km²). Sudan shares borders with 7 countries, while Sweden borders 2 countries. Sudan spans 1 timezone, compared to Sweden's 1 timezone. Sudan lies in Africa, while Sweden is located in Europe. Sudan is categorized within the Africa region (Northern Africa), whereas Sweden belongs to Europe (Northern Europe).
Key Differences
The most significant difference between Sudan and Sweden is in GDP per capita: Sudan's $984.608 compared to Sweden's $57,117.488 represents a 98% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Sweden is in infant mortality: Sudan's 39.2 per 1,000 compared to Sweden's 2.0 per 1,000 represents a 95% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Sweden is in GDP: Sudan's $49.7B compared to Sweden's $603.7B represents a 92% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Sudan's low-income economy and Sweden's high-income economy.
At a Glance: What the Numbers Mean
Living Standards
Sweden has a GDP per capita of $57,117.488, which is 58.0x that of Sudan ($984.608). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Sweden is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Population Density
Sudan is 1.2x more densely populated than Sweden (27 vs 24 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Sweden's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Healthcare and Longevity
Citizens of Sweden live an average of 17.0 years longer than those of Sudan (83.3 vs 66.3 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Economic Momentum
Sweden's economy grew at 0.8% compared to Sudan's -14.0%. Both economies are growing slowly, which may reflect maturity or structural challenges. Sudan's negative growth indicates economic contraction.
Travel Comparison
Sudan vs Sweden for Families
For family travel, Sweden generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (2.0 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Sweden's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Sudan vs Sweden for Budget Travelers
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sweden. However, Sweden may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Sudan vs Sweden for Retirees
Sweden's life expectancy of 83.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Sudan vs Sweden Cost of Living
Sweden's GDP per capita is 58.0x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sweden, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Sudan can approach or exceed average costs in Sweden's smaller cities.
Sudan vs Sweden for Digital Nomads
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Sweden, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Sweden covers 1. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is bigger, Sudan or Sweden by population?
Sudan is larger by population, with 51.7M residents compared to Sweden's 10.6M. Sudan is 4.9 times more populous than Sweden.
Which country has a higher GDP, Sudan or Sweden?
Sweden has the higher GDP at $603.7B, compared to Sudan's $49.7B. Sweden's economy is 12.2 times larger.
How does life expectancy compare between Sudan and Sweden?
Sweden has a higher life expectancy at 83.3 years, compared to Sudan's 66.3 years. The gap between the two countries is 17.0 years. Sudan's life expectancy is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years, while Sweden's is 11.3 years above the global average of 72 years.
Which country is larger by area, Sudan or Sweden?
Sudan is larger by land area, covering 1,886,068 km² compared to Sweden's 450,295 km². Sudan is 4.2 times larger than Sweden.
What languages are spoken in Sudan and Sweden?
Sudan recognizes the following languages: Arabic, English. Sweden recognizes: Swedish. The two countries do not share an official language.
Which country has lower inflation, Sudan or Sweden?
Inflation data is not available for Sudan. Sweden's inflation rate is 2.8%.
Is Sudan or Sweden better for a family holiday?
For family travel, Sweden generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (2.0 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attr...
Is Sudan or Sweden cheaper to visit?
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sweden. However, Sweden may offer better value in spec...
Is Sudan or Sweden better for retirement?
Sweden's life expectancy of 83.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate ...
Is Sudan or Sweden more expensive to live in?
Sweden's GDP per capita is 58.0x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sweden, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by c...
Is Sudan or Sweden better for digital nomads?
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Sweden, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Sweden covers 1. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both...