Kenya has a population of 53.3M, compared to Sweden's 10.6M. Kenya is 5.0 times more populous than Sweden. Economically, Sweden ($603.7B) has a GDP 5.0 times larger than Kenya's ($120.3B). Kenya covers 580,367 km², 1.3 times larger than Sweden's 450,295 km². Life expectancy in Sweden stands at 83.3 years, 19.7 years higher than Kenya's 63.6 years.
| Population | 53.3M | 10.6M |
| Area | 580,367 km² | 450,295 km² |
| GDP | $120.3B | $603.7B |
| GDP Per Capita | $2,132.435 | $57,117.488 |
| Life Expectancy | 63.6 yrs | 83.3 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 34.7 | 2.0 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 5.4% | 8.7% |
| Capital | Nairobi | Stockholm |
| Region | Africa | Europe |
| Languages | English, Swahili | Swedish |
| Currencies | KES (Sh) | SEK (kr) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Kenya is 5.0 times more populous than Sweden, with 53.3M residents compared to 10.6M. Kenya is among the world's 30 most populous countries, while Sweden is a nation of 10.6M people. In terms of population density, Kenya averages 92 people per km² (moderate), while Sweden averages 24 people per km² (sparse). Population growth rate data is not available for either country over the past decade.
Kenya is classified as a lower-middle-income economy, while Sweden is classified as a high-income economy. The Sweden economy ($603.7B) is 5.0 times larger than Kenya's ($120.3B). Kenya's GDP per capita of $2,132.435 is near the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Sweden's GDP per capita of $57,117.488 is 104% above the regional average of 28,000 for Europe. On a per-capita basis, residents of Sweden are on average 26.8 times wealthier than those in Kenya.
Life expectancy in Kenya is 63.6 years, compared to 83.3 years in Sweden, a gap of 19.7 years. Sweden (83.3 years) is 11.3 years above the global average of 72 years, while Kenya (63.6 years) is 8.4 years below the global average of 72 years. At 34.7 deaths per 1,000 live births, Kenya's infant mortality is 1635% higher than Sweden's 2.0.
Kenya (580,367 km²) is 1.3 times larger by land area than Sweden (450,295 km²). Kenya shares borders with 5 countries, while Sweden borders 2 countries. Kenya spans 1 timezone, compared to Sweden's 1 timezone. Kenya lies in Africa, while Sweden is located in Europe. Kenya is categorized within the Africa region (Eastern Africa), whereas Sweden belongs to Europe (Northern Europe).
The most significant difference between Kenya and Sweden is in GDP per capita: Kenya's $2,132.435 compared to Sweden's $57,117.488 represents a 96% gap. The most significant difference between Kenya and Sweden is in infant mortality: Kenya's 34.7 per 1,000 compared to Sweden's 2.0 per 1,000 represents a 94% gap. The most significant difference between Kenya and Sweden is in population: Kenya's 53.3M compared to Sweden's 10.6M represents a 80% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Kenya's lower-middle-income economy and Sweden's high-income economy.
Sweden has a GDP per capita of $57,117.488, which is 26.8x that of Kenya ($2,132.435). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Sweden is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Kenya is 3.9x more densely populated than Sweden (92 vs 24 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Sweden's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Sweden live an average of 19.7 years longer than those of Kenya (83.3 vs 63.6 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Kenya's economy grew at 4.7% compared to Sweden's 0.8%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Kenya has a modest edge in economic dynamism.
For family travel, Sweden generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (2.0 vs 34.7 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Kenya offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Sweden's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Kenya is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,132.435 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Kenya can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sweden. However, Sweden may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Sweden's life expectancy of 83.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Kenya may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Sweden's GDP per capita is 26.8x that of Kenya, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sweden, while Kenya offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Kenya can approach or exceed average costs in Sweden's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Kenya and Sweden, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Kenya spans 1 timezone while Sweden covers 1. Kenya's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Kenya is larger by population, with 53.3M residents compared to Sweden's 10.6M. Kenya is 5.0 times more populous than Sweden.
Sweden has the higher GDP at $603.7B, compared to Kenya's $120.3B. Sweden's economy is 5.0 times larger.
Sweden has a higher life expectancy at 83.3 years, compared to Kenya's 63.6 years. The gap between the two countries is 19.7 years. Kenya's life expectancy is 8.4 years below the global average of 72 years, while Sweden's is 11.3 years above the global average of 72 years.
Kenya is larger by land area, covering 580,367 km² compared to Sweden's 450,295 km². Kenya is 1.3 times larger than Sweden.
Kenya recognizes the following languages: English, Swahili. Sweden recognizes: Swedish. The two countries do not share an official language.
Sweden has lower inflation at 2.8%, compared to Kenya's 4.5%. Sweden's inflation is within the 2-3% range considered stable by most central banks, while Kenya's rate is moderately elevated above the global median of 3.5%.
For family travel, Sweden generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (2.0 vs 34.7 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Kenya offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attr...
Kenya is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,132.435 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Kenya can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sweden. However, Sweden may offer better value in sp...
Sweden's life expectancy of 83.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Kenya may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate ...
Sweden's GDP per capita is 26.8x that of Kenya, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sweden, while Kenya offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by c...
For digital nomads choosing between Kenya and Sweden, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Kenya spans 1 timezone while Sweden covers 1. Kenya's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both...