Mexico vs Sudan
Mexico has a population of 130.6M, compared to Sudan's 51.7M. Mexico is 2.5 times more populous than Sudan. Economically, Mexico ($1.86T) has a GDP 37.4 times larger than Sudan's ($49.7B). Mexico covers 1,964,375 km², 1.0 times larger than Sudan's 1,886,068 km². Life expectancy in Mexico stands at 75.1 years, 8.7 years higher than Sudan's 66.3 years.
MexicoSudan| Population | +152.8%130.6M | -60.4%51.7M |
| Area | +4.2%1,964,375 km² | -4.0%1,886,068 km² |
| GDP | +3637.2%$1.86T | -97.3%$49.7B |
| GDP Per Capita | +1340.8%$14,185.781 | -93.1%$984.608 |
| Life Expectancy | +13.2%75.1 yrs | -11.6%66.3 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | -72.4%10.8 | +263.0%39.2 |
| Literacy Rate | 95.9% | — |
| Unemployment | 2.7% | — |
| Capital | Mexico City | Khartoum |
| Region | Americas | Africa |
| Languages | Spanish | Arabic, English |
| Currencies | MXN ($) | SDG (ج.س) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Population Comparison
Mexico is 2.5 times more populous than Sudan, with 130.6M residents compared to 51.7M. Mexico is among the world's 15 most populous countries, while Sudan is among the world's 30 most populous countries. In terms of population density, Mexico averages 66 people per km² (moderate), while Sudan averages 27 people per km² (sparse). Mexico has grown at 0.92% annually over the past decade. Population growth data is not available for Sudan.
Economy Comparison
Mexico is classified as a high-income economy, while Sudan is classified as a low-income economy. The Mexico economy ($1.86T) is 37.4 times larger than Sudan's ($49.7B). Mexico's GDP per capita of $14,185.781 is 5% above the regional average of 13,500 for Americas. Sudan's GDP per capita of $984.608 is 55% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. On a per-capita basis, residents of Mexico are on average 14.4 times wealthier than those in Sudan.
Health & Quality of Life
Life expectancy in Mexico is 75.1 years, compared to 66.3 years in Sudan, a gap of 8.7 years. Mexico (75.1 years) is 3.1 years above the global average of 72 years, while Sudan (66.3 years) is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years. At 39.2 deaths per 1,000 live births, Sudan's infant mortality is 263% higher than Mexico's 10.8.
Geographic Comparison
Mexico (1,964,375 km²) is 1.0 times larger by land area than Sudan (1,886,068 km²). Mexico shares borders with 3 countries, while Sudan borders 7 countries. Mexico spans 3 timezones, compared to Sudan's 1 timezone. Mexico lies in North America, while Sudan is located in Africa. Mexico is categorized within the Americas region (North America), whereas Sudan belongs to Africa (Northern Africa).
Key Differences
The most significant difference between Mexico and Sudan is in GDP: Mexico's $1.86T compared to Sudan's $49.7B represents a 97% gap. The most significant difference between Mexico and Sudan is in GDP per capita: Mexico's $14,185.781 compared to Sudan's $984.608 represents a 93% gap. The most significant difference between Mexico and Sudan is in infant mortality: Mexico's 10.8 per 1,000 compared to Sudan's 39.2 per 1,000 represents a 72% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Mexico's high-income economy and Sudan's low-income economy.
At a Glance: What the Numbers Mean
Living Standards
Mexico has a GDP per capita of $14,185.781, which is 14.4x that of Sudan ($984.608). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Mexico is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Population Density
Mexico is 2.4x more densely populated than Sudan (66 vs 27 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Sudan's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Healthcare and Longevity
Citizens of Mexico live an average of 8.7 years longer than those of Sudan (75.1 vs 66.3 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Economic Momentum
Mexico's economy grew at 1.4% compared to Sudan's -14.0%. Both economies are growing slowly, which may reflect maturity or structural challenges. Sudan's negative growth indicates economic contraction.
Travel Comparison
Mexico vs Sudan for Families
For family travel, Mexico generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (10.8 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Mexico's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Mexico vs Sudan for Budget Travelers
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Mexico. However, Mexico may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Mexico vs Sudan for Retirees
Mexico's life expectancy of 75.1 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Mexico vs Sudan Cost of Living
Mexico's GDP per capita is 14.4x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Mexico, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Sudan can approach or exceed average costs in Mexico's smaller cities.
Mexico vs Sudan for Digital Nomads
For digital nomads choosing between Mexico and Sudan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Mexico spans 3 timezones while Sudan covers 1. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is bigger, Mexico or Sudan by population?
Mexico is larger by population, with 130.6M residents compared to Sudan's 51.7M. Mexico is 2.5 times more populous than Sudan.
Which country has a higher GDP, Mexico or Sudan?
Mexico has the higher GDP at $1.86T, compared to Sudan's $49.7B. Mexico's economy is 37.4 times larger.
How does life expectancy compare between Mexico and Sudan?
Mexico has a higher life expectancy at 75.1 years, compared to Sudan's 66.3 years. The gap between the two countries is 8.7 years. Mexico's life expectancy is 3.1 years above the global average of 72 years, while Sudan's is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years.
Which country is larger by area, Mexico or Sudan?
Mexico is larger by land area, covering 1,964,375 km² compared to Sudan's 1,886,068 km². Mexico is 1.0 times larger than Sudan.
What languages are spoken in Mexico and Sudan?
Mexico recognizes the following official language: Spanish. Sudan recognizes: Arabic, English. The two countries do not share an official language.
Which country has lower inflation, Mexico or Sudan?
Inflation data is not available for Sudan. Mexico's inflation rate is 4.7%.
Is Mexico or Sudan better for a family holiday?
For family travel, Mexico generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (10.8 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries...
Is Mexico or Sudan cheaper to visit?
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Mexico. However, Mexico may offer better value in spec...
Is Mexico or Sudan better for retirement?
Mexico's life expectancy of 75.1 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate ...
Is Mexico or Sudan more expensive to live in?
Mexico's GDP per capita is 14.4x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Mexico, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by c...
Is Mexico or Sudan better for digital nomads?
For digital nomads choosing between Mexico and Sudan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Mexico spans 3 timezones while Sudan covers 1. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Bot...