Papua New Guinea has a population of 11.8M, compared to Jordan's 11.7M. Papua New Guinea is 1.0 times more populous than Jordan. Economically, Jordan ($53.4B) has a GDP 1.7 times larger than Papua New Guinea's ($31.8B). Papua New Guinea covers 462,840 km², 5.2 times larger than Jordan's 89,342 km². Life expectancy in Jordan stands at 77.8 years, 11.7 years higher than Papua New Guinea's 66.1 years.
| Population | 11.8M | 11.7M |
| Area | 462,840 km² | 89,342 km² |
| GDP | $31.8B | $53.4B |
| GDP Per Capita | $3,006.706 | $4,618.096 |
| Life Expectancy | 66.1 yrs | 77.8 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 32.0 | 12.2 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 2.6% | 16.5% |
| Capital | Port Moresby | Amman |
| Region | Oceania | Asia |
| Languages | English, Hiri Motu, Tok Pisin | Arabic |
| Currencies | PGK (K) | JOD (د.ا) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Papua New Guinea is 1.0 times more populous than Jordan, with 11.8M residents compared to 11.7M. Papua New Guinea is a nation of 11.8M people, while Jordan is a nation of 11.7M people. In terms of population density, Papua New Guinea averages 25 people per km² (sparse), while Jordan averages 131 people per km² (moderate). While Papua New Guinea has grown at 2.27% annually over the past decade, Jordan has grown at 3.65% per year over the same period.
Papua New Guinea is classified as a lower-middle-income economy, while Jordan is classified as a upper-middle-income economy. The Jordan economy ($53.4B) is 1.7 times larger than Papua New Guinea's ($31.8B). Papua New Guinea's GDP per capita of $3,006.706 is 90% below the regional average of 31,500 for Oceania. Jordan's GDP per capita of $4,618.096 is 59% below the regional average of 11,200 for Asia. On a per-capita basis, residents of Jordan are on average 1.5 times wealthier than those in Papua New Guinea.
Life expectancy in Papua New Guinea is 66.1 years, compared to 77.8 years in Jordan, a gap of 11.7 years. Jordan (77.8 years) is 5.8 years above the global average of 72 years, while Papua New Guinea (66.1 years) is 5.9 years below the global average of 72 years. At 32.0 deaths per 1,000 live births, Papua New Guinea's infant mortality is 162% higher than Jordan's 12.2.
Papua New Guinea (462,840 km²) is 5.2 times larger by land area than Jordan (89,342 km²). Papua New Guinea shares borders with 1 country, while Jordan borders 5 countries. Papua New Guinea spans 1 timezone, compared to Jordan's 1 timezone. Papua New Guinea lies in Oceania, while Jordan is located in Asia. Papua New Guinea is categorized within the Oceania region (Melanesia), whereas Jordan belongs to Asia (Western Asia).
The most significant difference between Papua New Guinea and Jordan is in land area: Papua New Guinea's 462,840 km² compared to Jordan's 89,342 km² represents a 81% gap. The most significant difference between Papua New Guinea and Jordan is in infant mortality: Papua New Guinea's 32.0 per 1,000 compared to Jordan's 12.2 per 1,000 represents a 62% gap. The most significant difference between Papua New Guinea and Jordan is in GDP: Papua New Guinea's $31.8B compared to Jordan's $53.4B represents a 40% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Papua New Guinea's lower-middle-income economy and Jordan's upper-middle-income economy.
Jordan has a GDP per capita of $4,618.096, which is 1.5x that of Papua New Guinea ($3,006.706). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Jordan is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Jordan is 5.2x more densely populated than Papua New Guinea (131 vs 25 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Papua New Guinea's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Jordan live an average of 11.7 years longer than those of Papua New Guinea (77.8 vs 66.1 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Papua New Guinea's economy grew at 3.8% compared to Jordan's 2.5%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Papua New Guinea has a modest edge in economic dynamism.
For family travel, Jordan generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (12.2 vs 32.0 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Papua New Guinea offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Jordan's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Papua New Guinea is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $3,006.706 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Papua New Guinea can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Jordan. However, Jordan may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Jordan's life expectancy of 77.8 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Papua New Guinea may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Jordan's GDP per capita is 1.5x that of Papua New Guinea, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Jordan, while Papua New Guinea offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Papua New Guinea can approach or exceed average costs in Jordan's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Papua New Guinea and Jordan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Papua New Guinea spans 1 timezone while Jordan covers 1. Papua New Guinea's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Papua New Guinea is larger by population, with 11.8M residents compared to Jordan's 11.7M. Papua New Guinea is 1.0 times more populous than Jordan.
Jordan has the higher GDP at $53.4B, compared to Papua New Guinea's $31.8B. Jordan's economy is 1.7 times larger.
Jordan has a higher life expectancy at 77.8 years, compared to Papua New Guinea's 66.1 years. The gap between the two countries is 11.7 years. Papua New Guinea's life expectancy is 5.9 years below the global average of 72 years, while Jordan's is 5.8 years above the global average of 72 years.
Papua New Guinea is larger by land area, covering 462,840 km² compared to Jordan's 89,342 km². Papua New Guinea is 5.2 times larger than Jordan.
Papua New Guinea recognizes the following languages: English, Hiri Motu, Tok Pisin. Jordan recognizes: Arabic. The two countries do not share an official language.
Papua New Guinea has lower inflation at 0.6%, compared to Jordan's 1.6%. Papua New Guinea's inflation is within the 2-3% range considered stable by most central banks, while Jordan's rate is within the 2-3% range considered stable by most central banks.
For family travel, Jordan generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (12.2 vs 32.0 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Papua New Guinea offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-f...
Papua New Guinea is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $3,006.706 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Papua New Guinea can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Jordan. However, Jordan may of...
Jordan's life expectancy of 77.8 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Papua New Guinea may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare acces...
Jordan's GDP per capita is 1.5x that of Papua New Guinea, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Jordan, while Papua New Guinea offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living vari...
For digital nomads choosing between Papua New Guinea and Jordan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Papua New Guinea spans 1 timezone while Jordan covers 1. Papua New Guinea's lower cost of living makes it attractive f...
Papua New Guinea, 1994 to 2023
Jordan, 1994 to 2023