Sudan vs Australia
Sudan has a population of 51.7M, compared to Australia's 27.5M. Sudan is 1.9 times more populous than Australia. Economically, Australia ($1.76T) has a GDP 35.4 times larger than Sudan's ($49.7B). Australia covers 7,692,024 km², 4.1 times larger than Sudan's 1,886,068 km². Life expectancy in Australia stands at 83.1 years, 16.7 years higher than Sudan's 66.3 years.
| Population | +87.6%51.7M | -46.7%27.5M |
| Area | -75.5%1,886,068 km² | +307.8%7,692,024 km² |
| GDP | -97.2%$49.7B | +3437.2%$1.76T |
| GDP Per Capita | -98.5%$984.608 | +6461.4%$64,603.986 |
| Life Expectancy | -20.1%66.3 yrs | +25.2%83.1 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | +1164.5%39.2 | -92.1%3.1 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | — | 4.1% |
| Capital | Khartoum | Canberra |
| Region | Africa | Oceania |
| Languages | Arabic, English | English |
| Currencies | SDG (ج.س) | AUD ($) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Population Comparison
Sudan is 1.9 times more populous than Australia, with 51.7M residents compared to 27.5M. Sudan is among the world's 30 most populous countries, while Australia is a nation of 27.5M people. In terms of population density, Sudan averages 27 people per km² (sparse), while Australia averages 4 people per km² (sparse). Australia has grown at 1.43% annually over the past decade. Population growth data is not available for Sudan.
Economy Comparison
Sudan is classified as a low-income economy, while Australia is classified as a high-income economy. The Australia economy ($1.76T) is 35.4 times larger than Sudan's ($49.7B). Sudan's GDP per capita of $984.608 is 55% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Australia's GDP per capita of $64,603.986 is 105% above the regional average of 31,500 for Oceania. On a per-capita basis, residents of Australia are on average 65.6 times wealthier than those in Sudan.
Health & Quality of Life
Life expectancy in Sudan is 66.3 years, compared to 83.1 years in Australia, a gap of 16.7 years. Australia (83.1 years) is 11.1 years above the global average of 72 years, while Sudan (66.3 years) is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years. At 39.2 deaths per 1,000 live births, Sudan's infant mortality is 1165% higher than Australia's 3.1.
Geographic Comparison
Australia (7,692,024 km²) is 4.1 times larger by land area than Sudan (1,886,068 km²). Sudan shares borders with 7 countries, while Australia borders 0 countries. Sudan spans 1 timezone, compared to Australia's 8 timezones. Sudan lies in Africa, while Australia is located in Oceania. Sudan is categorized within the Africa region (Northern Africa), whereas Australia belongs to Oceania (Australia and New Zealand).
Key Differences
The most significant difference between Sudan and Australia is in GDP per capita: Sudan's $984.608 compared to Australia's $64,603.986 represents a 98% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Australia is in GDP: Sudan's $49.7B compared to Australia's $1.76T represents a 97% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Australia is in infant mortality: Sudan's 39.2 per 1,000 compared to Australia's 3.1 per 1,000 represents a 92% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Sudan's low-income economy and Australia's high-income economy.
At a Glance: What the Numbers Mean
Living Standards
Australia has a GDP per capita of $64,603.986, which is 65.6x that of Sudan ($984.608). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Australia is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Population Density
Sudan is 7.7x more densely populated than Australia (27 vs 4 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Australia's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Healthcare and Longevity
Citizens of Australia live an average of 16.7 years longer than those of Sudan (83.1 vs 66.3 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Economic Momentum
Australia's economy grew at 1.4% compared to Sudan's -14.0%. Both economies are growing slowly, which may reflect maturity or structural challenges. Sudan's negative growth indicates economic contraction.
Travel Comparison
Sudan vs Australia for Families
For family travel, Australia generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (3.1 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Australia's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Sudan vs Australia for Budget Travelers
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Australia. However, Australia may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Sudan vs Australia for Retirees
Australia's life expectancy of 83.1 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Sudan vs Australia Cost of Living
Australia's GDP per capita is 65.6x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Australia, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Sudan can approach or exceed average costs in Australia's smaller cities.
Sudan vs Australia for Digital Nomads
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Australia, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Australia covers 8. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is bigger, Sudan or Australia by population?
Sudan is larger by population, with 51.7M residents compared to Australia's 27.5M. Sudan is 1.9 times more populous than Australia.
Which country has a higher GDP, Sudan or Australia?
Australia has the higher GDP at $1.76T, compared to Sudan's $49.7B. Australia's economy is 35.4 times larger.
How does life expectancy compare between Sudan and Australia?
Australia has a higher life expectancy at 83.1 years, compared to Sudan's 66.3 years. The gap between the two countries is 16.7 years. Sudan's life expectancy is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years, while Australia's is 11.1 years above the global average of 72 years.
Which country is larger by area, Sudan or Australia?
Australia is larger by land area, covering 7,692,024 km² compared to Sudan's 1,886,068 km². Australia is 4.1 times larger than Sudan.
What languages are spoken in Sudan and Australia?
Sudan recognizes the following languages: Arabic, English. Australia recognizes: English. Both countries share at least one common language.
Which country has lower inflation, Sudan or Australia?
Inflation data is not available for Sudan. Australia's inflation rate is 3.2%.
Is Sudan or Australia better for a family holiday?
For family travel, Australia generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (3.1 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countri...
Is Sudan or Australia cheaper to visit?
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Australia. However, Australia may offer better value i...
Is Sudan or Australia better for retirement?
Australia's life expectancy of 83.1 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, clima...
Is Sudan or Australia more expensive to live in?
Australia's GDP per capita is 65.6x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Australia, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantl...
Is Sudan or Australia better for digital nomads?
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Australia, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Australia covers 8. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income...