Romania vs South Sudan
Romania has a population of 19.0M, compared to South Sudan's 15.8M. Romania is 1.2 times more populous than South Sudan. South Sudan covers 619,745 km², 2.6 times larger than Romania's 238,391 km². Life expectancy in Romania stands at 76.6 years, 19.0 years higher than South Sudan's 57.6 years.
RomaniaSouth Sudan| Population | +20.6%19.0M | -17.1%15.8M |
| Area | -61.5%238,391 km² | +160.0%619,745 km² |
| GDP | $382.6B | — |
| GDP Per Capita | $20,080.21 | — |
| Life Expectancy | +33.0%76.6 yrs | -24.8%57.6 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | -92.6%5.4 | +1244.4%72.6 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 6.0% | — |
| Capital | Bucharest | Juba |
| Region | Europe | Africa |
| Languages | Romanian | English |
| Currencies | RON (lei) | SSP (£) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Population Comparison
Romania is 1.2 times more populous than South Sudan, with 19.0M residents compared to 15.8M. Romania is a nation of 19.0M people, while South Sudan is a nation of 15.8M people. In terms of population density, Romania averages 80 people per km² (moderate), while South Sudan averages 25 people per km² (sparse). Population growth rate data is not available for either country over the past decade.
Economy Comparison
Romania is classified as a high-income economy, while South Sudan is classified as a low-income economy. Romania's GDP stands at $382.6B. GDP data is not available for South Sudan. Romania's GDP per capita of $20,080.21 is 28% below the regional average of 28,000 for Europe. Economic indicator data is not available for South Sudan.
Health & Quality of Life
Life expectancy in Romania is 76.6 years, compared to 57.6 years in South Sudan, a gap of 19.0 years. Romania (76.6 years) is 4.6 years above the global average of 72 years, while South Sudan (57.6 years) is 14.4 years below the global average of 72 years. At 72.6 deaths per 1,000 live births, South Sudan's infant mortality is 1244% higher than Romania's 5.4.
Geographic Comparison
South Sudan (619,745 km²) is 2.6 times larger by land area than Romania (238,391 km²). Romania shares borders with 5 countries, while South Sudan borders 6 countries. Romania spans 1 timezone, compared to South Sudan's 1 timezone. Romania lies in Europe, while South Sudan is located in Africa. Romania is categorized within the Europe region (Southeast Europe), whereas South Sudan belongs to Africa (Middle Africa).
Key Differences
The most significant difference between Romania and South Sudan is in infant mortality: Romania's 5.4 per 1,000 compared to South Sudan's 72.6 per 1,000 represents a 93% gap. The most significant difference between Romania and South Sudan is in land area: Romania's 238,391 km² compared to South Sudan's 619,745 km² represents a 62% gap. The most significant difference between Romania and South Sudan is in life expectancy: Romania's 76.6 years compared to South Sudan's 57.6 years represents a 25% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Romania's high-income economy and South Sudan's low-income economy.
At a Glance: What the Numbers Mean
Population Density
Romania is 3.1x more densely populated than South Sudan (80 vs 25 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. South Sudan's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Healthcare and Longevity
Citizens of Romania live an average of 19.0 years longer than those of South Sudan (76.6 vs 57.6 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Travel Comparison
Romania vs South Sudan for Families
For family travel, Romania generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (5.4 vs 72.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. South Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Romania's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Romania vs South Sudan for Budget Travelers
Romania is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $20,080.21 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Romania can expect to spend significantly less per day than in South Sudan. However, South Sudan may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Romania vs South Sudan for Retirees
Romania's life expectancy of 76.6 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. South Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Romania vs South Sudan for Digital Nomads
For digital nomads choosing between Romania and South Sudan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Romania spans 1 timezone while South Sudan covers 1. Cost of living varies by city in both countries. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is bigger, Romania or South Sudan by population?
Romania is larger by population, with 19.0M residents compared to South Sudan's 15.8M. Romania is 1.2 times more populous than South Sudan.
Which country has a higher GDP, Romania or South Sudan?
GDP data is not available for South Sudan. Please refer to the World Bank for the most current figures.
How does life expectancy compare between Romania and South Sudan?
Romania has a higher life expectancy at 76.6 years, compared to South Sudan's 57.6 years. The gap between the two countries is 19.0 years. Romania's life expectancy is 4.6 years above the global average of 72 years, while South Sudan's is 14.4 years below the global average of 72 years.
Which country is larger by area, Romania or South Sudan?
South Sudan is larger by land area, covering 619,745 km² compared to Romania's 238,391 km². South Sudan is 2.6 times larger than Romania.
What languages are spoken in Romania and South Sudan?
Romania recognizes the following official language: Romanian. South Sudan recognizes: English. The two countries do not share an official language.
Which country has lower inflation, Romania or South Sudan?
Romania has lower inflation at 5.7%, compared to South Sudan's 91.4%. Romania's inflation is moderately elevated above the global median of 3.5%, while South Sudan's rate is severely elevated at 91.4%, a rate that erodes household purchasing power.
Is Romania or South Sudan better for a family holiday?
For family travel, Romania generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (5.4 vs 72.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. South Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friend...
Is Romania or South Sudan cheaper to visit?
Romania is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $20,080.21 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Romania can expect to spend significantly less per day than in South Sudan. However, South Sudan may offer bett...
Is Romania or South Sudan better for retirement?
Romania's life expectancy of 76.6 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. South Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, c...
Is Romania or South Sudan better for digital nomads?
For digital nomads choosing between Romania and South Sudan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Romania spans 1 timezone while South Sudan covers 1. Cost of living varies by city in both countries. Both countries have ...