Sri Lanka has a population of 21.8M, compared to Zimbabwe's 17.1M. Sri Lanka is 1.3 times more populous than Zimbabwe. Economically, Sri Lanka ($99.0B) has a GDP 2.4 times larger than Zimbabwe's ($41.5B). Zimbabwe covers 390,757 km², 6.0 times larger than Sri Lanka's 65,610 km². Life expectancy in Sri Lanka stands at 77.5 years, 14.7 years higher than Zimbabwe's 62.8 years.
| Population | 21.8M | 17.1M |
| Area | 65,610 km² | 390,757 km² |
| GDP | $99.0B | $41.5B |
| GDP Per Capita | $4,515.568 | $2,497.203 |
| Life Expectancy | 77.5 yrs | 62.8 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 5.3 | 40.6 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 4.0% | 9.3% |
| Capital | Sri Jayawardenepura Kotte | Harare |
| Region | Asia | Africa |
| Languages | Sinhala, Tamil | Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Khoisan, Ndau, Northern Ndebele, Chewa, Shona, Sotho, Tonga, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zimbabwean Sign Language |
| Currencies | LKR (Rs රු) | ZWL ($) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Sri Lanka is 1.3 times more populous than Zimbabwe, with 21.8M residents compared to 17.1M. Sri Lanka is a nation of 21.8M people, while Zimbabwe is a nation of 17.1M people. In terms of population density, Sri Lanka averages 332 people per km² (dense), while Zimbabwe averages 44 people per km² (sparse). Zimbabwe has grown at 1.55% annually over the past decade. Population growth data is not available for Sri Lanka.
Sri Lanka is classified as a upper-middle-income economy, while Zimbabwe is classified as a lower-middle-income economy. The Sri Lanka economy ($99.0B) is 2.4 times larger than Zimbabwe's ($41.5B). Sri Lanka's GDP per capita of $4,515.568 is 60% below the regional average of 11,200 for Asia. Zimbabwe's GDP per capita of $2,497.203 is 14% above the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. On a per-capita basis, residents of Sri Lanka are on average 1.8 times wealthier than those in Zimbabwe.
Life expectancy in Sri Lanka is 77.5 years, compared to 62.8 years in Zimbabwe, a gap of 14.7 years. Sri Lanka (77.5 years) is 5.5 years above the global average of 72 years, while Zimbabwe (62.8 years) is 9.2 years below the global average of 72 years. At 40.6 deaths per 1,000 live births, Zimbabwe's infant mortality is 666% higher than Sri Lanka's 5.3.
Zimbabwe (390,757 km²) is 6.0 times larger by land area than Sri Lanka (65,610 km²). Sri Lanka shares borders with 0 countries, while Zimbabwe borders 4 countries. Sri Lanka spans 1 timezone, compared to Zimbabwe's 1 timezone. Sri Lanka lies in Asia, while Zimbabwe is located in Africa. Sri Lanka is categorized within the Asia region (Southern Asia), whereas Zimbabwe belongs to Africa (Southern Africa).
The most significant difference between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe is in infant mortality: Sri Lanka's 5.3 per 1,000 compared to Zimbabwe's 40.6 per 1,000 represents a 87% gap. The most significant difference between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe is in land area: Sri Lanka's 65,610 km² compared to Zimbabwe's 390,757 km² represents a 83% gap. The most significant difference between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe is in GDP: Sri Lanka's $99.0B compared to Zimbabwe's $41.5B represents a 58% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Sri Lanka's upper-middle-income economy and Zimbabwe's lower-middle-income economy.
Sri Lanka has a GDP per capita of $4,515.568, which is 1.8x that of Zimbabwe ($2,497.203). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Sri Lanka is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Sri Lanka is 7.6x more densely populated than Zimbabwe (332 vs 44 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Zimbabwe's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Sri Lanka live an average of 14.7 years longer than those of Zimbabwe (77.5 vs 62.8 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Sri Lanka's economy grew at 5.0% compared to Zimbabwe's 1.7%. Sri Lanka's high growth rate suggests a rapidly developing economy with expanding opportunities.
For family travel, Sri Lanka generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (5.3 vs 40.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Zimbabwe offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Sri Lanka's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Zimbabwe is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,497.203 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Zimbabwe can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sri Lanka. However, Sri Lanka may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Sri Lanka's life expectancy of 77.5 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Zimbabwe may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Sri Lanka's GDP per capita is 1.8x that of Zimbabwe, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sri Lanka, while Zimbabwe offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Zimbabwe can approach or exceed average costs in Sri Lanka's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sri Lanka spans 1 timezone while Zimbabwe covers 1. Zimbabwe's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Sri Lanka is larger by population, with 21.8M residents compared to Zimbabwe's 17.1M. Sri Lanka is 1.3 times more populous than Zimbabwe.
Sri Lanka has the higher GDP at $99.0B, compared to Zimbabwe's $41.5B. Sri Lanka's economy is 2.4 times larger.
Sri Lanka has a higher life expectancy at 77.5 years, compared to Zimbabwe's 62.8 years. The gap between the two countries is 14.7 years. Sri Lanka's life expectancy is 5.5 years above the global average of 72 years, while Zimbabwe's is 9.2 years below the global average of 72 years.
Zimbabwe is larger by land area, covering 390,757 km² compared to Sri Lanka's 65,610 km². Zimbabwe is 6.0 times larger than Sri Lanka.
Sri Lanka recognizes the following languages: Sinhala, Tamil. Zimbabwe recognizes: Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Khoisan, Ndau, Northern Ndebele, Chewa, Shona, Sotho, Tonga, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zimbabwean Sign Language. The two countries do not share an official language.
Inflation data is not available for Zimbabwe. Sri Lanka's inflation rate is -0.4%.
For family travel, Sri Lanka generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (5.3 vs 40.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Zimbabwe offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendl...
Zimbabwe is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,497.203 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Zimbabwe can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sri Lanka. However, Sri Lanka may offer better...
Sri Lanka's life expectancy of 77.5 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Zimbabwe may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, cl...
Sri Lanka's GDP per capita is 1.8x that of Zimbabwe, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sri Lanka, while Zimbabwe offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies signifi...
For digital nomads choosing between Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sri Lanka spans 1 timezone while Zimbabwe covers 1. Zimbabwe's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remo...