Zimbabwe has a population of 17.1M, compared to Tunisia's 12.0M. Zimbabwe is 1.4 times more populous than Tunisia. Economically, Tunisia ($51.3B) has a GDP 1.2 times larger than Zimbabwe's ($41.5B). Zimbabwe covers 390,757 km², 2.4 times larger than Tunisia's 163,610 km². Life expectancy in Tunisia stands at 76.5 years, 13.7 years higher than Zimbabwe's 62.8 years.
| Population | 17.1M | 12.0M |
| Area | 390,757 km² | 163,610 km² |
| GDP | $41.5B | $51.3B |
| GDP Per Capita | $2,497.203 | $4,181.138 |
| Life Expectancy | 62.8 yrs | 76.5 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 40.6 | 10.6 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 9.3% | 15.1% |
| Capital | Harare | Tunis |
| Region | Africa | Africa |
| Languages | Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Khoisan, Ndau, Northern Ndebele, Chewa, Shona, Sotho, Tonga, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zimbabwean Sign Language | Arabic |
| Currencies | ZWL ($) | TND (د.ت) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Zimbabwe is 1.4 times more populous than Tunisia, with 17.1M residents compared to 12.0M. Zimbabwe is a nation of 17.1M people, while Tunisia is a nation of 12.0M people. In terms of population density, Zimbabwe averages 44 people per km² (sparse), while Tunisia averages 73 people per km² (moderate). While Zimbabwe has grown at 1.55% annually over the past decade, Tunisia has grown at 0.91% per year over the same period.
Zimbabwe is classified as a lower-middle-income economy, while Tunisia is classified as a lower-middle-income economy. The Tunisia economy ($51.3B) is 1.2 times larger than Zimbabwe's ($41.5B). Zimbabwe's GDP per capita of $2,497.203 is 14% above the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Tunisia's GDP per capita of $4,181.138 is 90% above the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. On a per-capita basis, residents of Tunisia are on average 1.7 times wealthier than those in Zimbabwe.
Life expectancy in Zimbabwe is 62.8 years, compared to 76.5 years in Tunisia, a gap of 13.7 years. Tunisia (76.5 years) is 4.5 years above the global average of 72 years, while Zimbabwe (62.8 years) is 9.2 years below the global average of 72 years. At 40.6 deaths per 1,000 live births, Zimbabwe's infant mortality is 283% higher than Tunisia's 10.6.
Zimbabwe (390,757 km²) is 2.4 times larger by land area than Tunisia (163,610 km²). Zimbabwe shares borders with 4 countries, while Tunisia borders 2 countries. Zimbabwe spans 1 timezone, compared to Tunisia's 1 timezone. Both Zimbabwe and Tunisia are located in Africa. Both countries fall within the Africa region, though they occupy different subregions: Southern Africa and Northern Africa.
The most significant difference between Zimbabwe and Tunisia is in infant mortality: Zimbabwe's 40.6 per 1,000 compared to Tunisia's 10.6 per 1,000 represents a 74% gap. The most significant difference between Zimbabwe and Tunisia is in land area: Zimbabwe's 390,757 km² compared to Tunisia's 163,610 km² represents a 58% gap. The most significant difference between Zimbabwe and Tunisia is in GDP per capita: Zimbabwe's $2,497.203 compared to Tunisia's $4,181.138 represents a 40% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Zimbabwe's lower-middle-income economy and Tunisia's lower-middle-income economy.
Tunisia has a GDP per capita of $4,181.138, which is 1.7x that of Zimbabwe ($2,497.203). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Tunisia is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Tunisia is 1.7x more densely populated than Zimbabwe (73 vs 44 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Zimbabwe's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Tunisia live an average of 13.7 years longer than those of Zimbabwe (76.5 vs 62.8 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Zimbabwe's economy grew at 1.7% compared to Tunisia's 1.6%. Both economies are growing slowly, which may reflect maturity or structural challenges.
For family travel, Tunisia generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (10.6 vs 40.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Zimbabwe offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Tunisia's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Zimbabwe is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,497.203 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Zimbabwe can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Tunisia. However, Tunisia may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Tunisia's life expectancy of 76.5 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Zimbabwe may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Tunisia's GDP per capita is 1.7x that of Zimbabwe, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Tunisia, while Zimbabwe offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Zimbabwe can approach or exceed average costs in Tunisia's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Zimbabwe and Tunisia, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Zimbabwe spans 1 timezone while Tunisia covers 1. Zimbabwe's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Zimbabwe is larger by population, with 17.1M residents compared to Tunisia's 12.0M. Zimbabwe is 1.4 times more populous than Tunisia.
Tunisia has the higher GDP at $51.3B, compared to Zimbabwe's $41.5B. Tunisia's economy is 1.2 times larger.
Tunisia has a higher life expectancy at 76.5 years, compared to Zimbabwe's 62.8 years. The gap between the two countries is 13.7 years. Zimbabwe's life expectancy is 9.2 years below the global average of 72 years, while Tunisia's is 4.5 years above the global average of 72 years.
Zimbabwe is larger by land area, covering 390,757 km² compared to Tunisia's 163,610 km². Zimbabwe is 2.4 times larger than Tunisia.
Zimbabwe recognizes the following languages: Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Khoisan, Ndau, Northern Ndebele, Chewa, Shona, Sotho, Tonga, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zimbabwean Sign Language. Tunisia recognizes: Arabic. The two countries do not share an official language.
Inflation data is not available for Zimbabwe. Tunisia's inflation rate is 7.2%.
For family travel, Tunisia generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (10.6 vs 40.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Zimbabwe offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly...
Zimbabwe is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,497.203 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Zimbabwe can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Tunisia. However, Tunisia may offer better val...
Tunisia's life expectancy of 76.5 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Zimbabwe may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, clim...
Tunisia's GDP per capita is 1.7x that of Zimbabwe, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Tunisia, while Zimbabwe offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significant...
For digital nomads choosing between Zimbabwe and Tunisia, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Zimbabwe spans 1 timezone while Tunisia covers 1. Zimbabwe's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote i...
Zimbabwe, 1994 to 2023
Tunisia, 1994 to 2023